ByteDance model product
Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance's low-cost, low-latency next-generation agent model for large-scale production.
Updated Aug 17, 2026. Default version: Seed 2.1 Turbo
LLMBoard Score73.5Seed 2.1 Turbo
Coverage80%52 benchmark families
Context window256KTokens
Official input priceN/AOfficial price unavailable
Seed 2.1 Turbo Capability Profile
This profile uses the model's current scored version. Arena ratings and prices are shown separately.
Seed 2.1 Turbo Benchmark Results
Benchmark scores for Seed 2.1 Turbo.
Sort by
Benchmark | Score | Rank | Participants | Percentile | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| BenchmarkAetherCode | Score67.9% | Rank01 | Participants2 | Percentile100.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkBeyond AIME | Score88.0% | Rank01 | Participants5 | Percentile100.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkDUDE | Score83.1% | Rank01 | Participants2 | Percentile100.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkFrontierCS | Score50.8% | Rank01 | Participants2 | Percentile100.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkFrontierScience Olympiad | Score76.0% | Rank01 | Participants3 | Percentile100.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLiveMathematicianBench | Score27.7% | Rank01 | Participants2 | Percentile100.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLiveSports-3K | Score77.1% | Rank01 | Participants2 | Percentile100.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkWildClawBench | Score62.8% | Rank01 | Participants5 | Percentile100.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkAgent Startup Bench | Score54.0% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkArcAGI2 | Score61.3% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkArtifacts Bench | Score47.0% | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkBLINK | Score79.4% | Rank02 | Participants15 | Percentile92.9% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkChartQAPro | Score70.9% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkCharXiv-D | Score94.6% | Rank02 | Participants17 | Percentile93.8% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkContPhy | Score61.1% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkCreativeWork | Score34.5% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkCrossVid | Score63.2% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkDoubao Multi-Turn Bench | Score49.0% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkEMMA | Score78.4% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkFinance Agent v1.1 | Score56.0% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkFrontierScience Research | Score33.3% | Rank02 | Participants4 | Percentile66.7% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkGameWorld | Score25.9% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkGDPval | Score82.7% | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkImage2FloorPlan | Score35.9% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkKINA | Score46.6% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLongVideoBench | Score80.6% | Rank02 | Participants4 | Percentile66.7% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMathVerse | Score89.2% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMathVista | Score90.5% | Rank02 | Participants39 | Percentile97.4% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMeasureBench | Score58.9% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMinerva | Score65.9% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMMLongBench-128K | Score76.9% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMMSIBench | Score31.4% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMotionBench | Score74.8% | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMSQA | Score42.0% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkOfficeQA Pro | Score71.1% | Rank02 | Participants7 | Percentile83.3% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkOneMillion Bench | Score66.6% | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkOSWorld | Score76.4% | Rank02 | Participants20 | Percentile94.7% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkOVBench | Score69.7% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkOVOBench | Score79.2% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkPresentBench | Score48.3% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkRepo Env | Score46.7% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkSeedClawBench | Score63.8% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkSuperChem | Score56.6% | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkSWE-Atlas | Score30.6% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkTOMATO | Score56.8% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkTrae Code Gen | Score59.7% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkTrae Error Fix | Score56.7% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkTreeBench | Score71.1% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkVideoHolmes | Score67.6% | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkVideo-MME | Score89.0% | Rank02 | Participants17 | Percentile93.8% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkVideoSimpleQA | Score71.4% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkVisFactor | Score43.9% | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkVisuLogic | Score0.529 points | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkVLMsAreBiased | Score68.3% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkWeb Bench | Score73.6% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkWorkspace Bench | Score54.7% | Rank02 | Participants3 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkWorldBench | Score63.7% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkxDailyBench | Score56.4% | Rank02 | Participants2 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkERQA | Score71.3% | Rank03 | Participants24 | Percentile91.3% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkHorizonMath | Score2.0% | Rank03 | Participants3 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMobileWorld | Score70.0% | Rank03 | Participants3 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkSciCode | Score57.8% | Rank03 | Participants21 | Percentile90.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkTVBench | Score77.2% | Rank03 | Participants3 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkClawEval-MM | Score46.0% | Rank04 | Participants4 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkLVBench | Score76.8% | Rank04 | Participants25 | Percentile87.5% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkOCRBench_V2 | Score62.8% | Rank04 | Participants7 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkRealWorldQA | Score86.3% | Rank04 | Participants29 | Percentile89.3% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkWorldVQA | Score48.6% | Rank04 | Participants5 | Percentile25.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkAPEX-Agents | Score29.2% | Rank05 | Participants8 | Percentile42.9% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMathVision | Score92.7% | Rank05 | Participants33 | Percentile87.5% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkPostTrainBench | Score18.3% | Rank05 | Participants6 | Percentile20.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkProgram Bench | Score49.4% | Rank05 | Participants6 | Percentile20.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkZEROBench | Score0.11 points | Rank05 | Participants9 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMathArena Apex | Score35.4% | Rank06 | Participants8 | Percentile28.6% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMCP Atlas | Score80.3% | Rank06 | Participants33 | Percentile84.4% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkMMMU-Pro | Score82.2% | Rank06 | Participants68 | Percentile92.5% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkSimpleVQA | Score0.711 points | Rank06 | Participants14 | Percentile61.5% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkSuperGPQA | Score67.4% | Rank06 | Participants34 | Percentile84.8% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkBabyVision | Score62.9% | Rank07 | Participants10 | Percentile33.3% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkDynaMath | Score68.1% | Rank07 | Participants7 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkEmbSpatialBench | Score0.825 points | Rank08 | Participants8 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkNL2Repo | Score43.7% | Rank09 | Participants17 | Percentile50.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkBrowseComp | Score84.9% | Rank10 | Participants62 | Percentile85.3% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkDeepSWE | Score23.0% | Rank11 | Participants11 | Percentile0.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkCyberGym | Score67.0% | Rank12 | Participants13 | Percentile8.3% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkCharXiv-R | Score83.6% | Rank15 | Participants51 | Percentile72.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkHumanity's Last Exam | Score54.6% | Rank15 | Participants99 | Percentile85.7% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 2.1 | Score67.6% | Rank20 | Participants28 | Percentile29.6% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkToolathlon | Score49.1% | Rank21 | Participants37 | Percentile44.4% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| BenchmarkSWE-Bench Pro | Score57.0% | Rank26 | Participants50 | Percentile49.0% | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
Seed 2.1 Turbo Arena Results
Preference and agent-evaluation results for the default version.
No Arena results
The default version does not have a matching Arena result yet.
Seed 2.1 Turbo Pricing
Official vendor API pricing appears first, followed by individual provider offers.
- Official API
- N/A
- Official provider
- N/A
- Lowest third-party
- From $0.442 input, $2.21 output per 1M via Ofox
- Tracked offerings
- 5
Sort by
Provider | Provider model ID | Region | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Context | Updated |
|---|
| ProviderOfox | Provider model IDvolcengine/doubao-seed-2.1-turbo | Regionglobal | Input / 1M$0.442 | Output / 1M$2.21 | Context256K | Updated |
| ProviderOpenRouter | Provider model IDbytedance-seed/seed-2-1-turbo | Regionglobal | Input / 1M$0.50 | Output / 1M$2.5 | Context262.1K | Updated |
| ProviderLLM Gateway | Provider model IDseed-2-1-turbo | Regionglobal | Input / 1M$0.50 | Output / 1M$2.5 | Context262.1K | Updated |
| ProviderVenice AI | Provider model IDseed-2-1-turbo | Regionglobal | Input / 1M$0.625 | Output / 1M$3.13 | Context256K | Updated |
| ProviderEmpirioLabs AI | Provider model IDseed-2-1-turbo | Regionglobal | Input / 1M$0.63 | Output / 1M$3.13 | Context256K | Updated |
Official prices use only the vendor's configured official Provider and positive standard USD PAYG rates. Third-party offers remain explicitly labeled.
Seed 2.1 Turbo Runtime Performance
Provider-specific output speed and catalog latency for Seed 2.1 Turbo. Runtime does not affect the capability score.
No runtime data
Browse runtime rankingsNo provider-specific speed or latency record is linked to the default version yet.
Output Speed is generated output tokens received per second. Catalog latency is reported separately from observed provider TTFT.
Seed 2.1 Turbo Specifications
Technical details for the model's default version.
- Version
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Released
- Jun 24, 2026
- Knowledge cutoff
- Unknown
- Parameters
- N/A
- Context window
- 256K
- Max output
- 256K
- Inputs
- image, text, video
- Outputs
- text
- Open weights
- No
- License
- Proprietary
Seed 2.1 Turbo Versions
Available versions of this model. The score column identifies the version used in the overall ranking.
Sort by
Version | Released | LLMBoard | Parameters | Context | Max output | Open weights | License |
|---|
| VersionSeed 2.1 Turbo | Released | LLMBoard73.5 | ParametersN/A | Context256K | Max output256K | Open weightsNo | LicenseProprietary |
Seed 2.1 Turbo vs nearby models
Open a comparison with the three ranked models immediately above and below this model.
Models similar to Seed 2.1 Turbo
Recommendations prioritize the same model type and family, then the closest LLMBoard score.
BY
Seed 2.0 Pro
ByteDance
BY
Seed 2.1 Pro
ByteDance
BY
Seed 2.0 Lite
ByteDance
ME
Muse Spark
Meta
GO
Google
Gemini 3.6 Flash
AC
Qwen3.7 Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
What is Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Key information about Seed 2.1 Turbo and its available data.
ByteDance's low-cost, low-latency next-generation agent model for large-scale production. 1 Pro and comparable performance, it is designed for enterprise-grade deployments handling high volumes of online calls across coding, long-chain agents, and multimodal tasks. 1-turbo.
Data as of 2026-08-17.
FAQ
Common questions about Seed 2.1 Turbo.
When was Seed 2.1 Turbo released?
Seed 2.1 Turbo's default version was released on Jun 24, 2026.
How much does Seed 2.1 Turbo cost?
No official standard PAYG price is currently available for Seed 2.1 Turbo. The lowest tracked third-party offer starts at $0.442 input and $2.21 output via Ofox.
Who created Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Turbo was created by ByteDance.
What is the context window for Seed 2.1 Turbo?
The default version has a 256K token context window.
Is Seed 2.1 Turbo open weight?
No. The default version is not marked as having publicly available weights.
How many API providers offer Seed 2.1 Turbo?
5 provider offerings are linked to the default version.
What models should I compare Seed 2.1 Turbo with?
Nearby ranked alternatives include GPT-5.5-Pro, Kimi K2.6, Gemini 3.6 Flash.