multimodal benchmark
ClawEval-MM Leaderboard
ClawEval-MM is the multimodal variant of ClawEval, evaluating agentic problem solving with visual inputs.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Models4
Model coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB
ClawEval-MM Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Sort by
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score56.9% | Percentile100.0% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score55.7% | Percentile66.7% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelBY | Score51.0% | Percentile33.3% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelBY | Score46.0% | Percentile0.0% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
ClawEval-MM Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
ClawEval-MM Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The Top AI Models for ClawEval-MM
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis claweval-mm AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
- 01ACQwen3.8-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
- Score
- 56.9%
Strengths
- Ranks #1 of 4 compared models
- 100th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability
- 02ACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
- Score
- 55.7%
- Price
- $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens
Strengths
- Ranks #2 of 4 compared models
- 67th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability
- 03BYSeed 2.1 ProByteDance
- Score
- 51.0%
Strengths
- Ranks #3 of 4 compared models
- 33th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability
- 04BYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance
- Score
- 46.0%
Strengths
- Ranks #4 of 4 compared models
- 0th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures ClawEval-MM, not total model capability
Selection summary
Best AI Models for ClawEval-MM
Qwen3.8-27B currently leads ClawEval-MM with 56.9%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What is ClawEval-MM?
What ClawEval-MM measures and how its scores work.
ClawEval-MM is the multimodal variant of ClawEval, evaluating agentic problem solving with visual inputs.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- ClawEval-MM
- Modality
- multimodal
- Primary category
- multimodal
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- Yes
- Evaluation key
- claw-eval-mm|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about ClawEval-MM.
Which model scores highest on ClawEval-MM?
Qwen3.8-27B is currently ranked first with 56.9%.
What does ClawEval-MM measure?
ClawEval-MM is the multimodal variant of ClawEval, evaluating agentic problem solving with visual inputs.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
4 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.