agents benchmark
Program Bench evaluates code-generation agents by asking them to recreate a program's behavior from only a compiled binary and documentation. It spans 200 tasks from small CLI tools to large systems such as FFmpeg and SQLite, with submissions judged against more than 248,000 fuzz-generated behavioral tests.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | MA | 77.8% | 100.0% | 5 | C | |
| 02 | ZA | 63.7% | 75.0% | 5 | C | |
| 03 | MA | 53.6% | 50.0% | 5 | C | |
| 04 | BY | 50.3% | 25.0% | 5 | C | |
| 05 | BY | 49.4% | 0.0% | 5 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What Program Bench measures and how its scores work.
Program Bench evaluates code-generation agents by asking them to recreate a program's behavior from only a compiled binary and documentation. It spans 200 tasks from small CLI tools to large systems such as FFmpeg and SQLite, with submissions judged against more than 248,000 fuzz-generated behavioral tests.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Program Bench.
Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 77.8%.
Program Bench evaluates code-generation agents by asking them to recreate a program's behavior from only a compiled binary and documentation. It spans 200 tasks from small CLI tools to large systems such as FFmpeg and SQLite, with submissions judged against more than 248,000 fuzz-generated behavioral tests.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.