llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

APEX-Agents Leaderboard

APEX-Agents is a benchmark evaluating AI agents on long horizon professional tasks that require sustained reasoning, planning, and execution across complex multi-step workflows.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models8
Model coverage8
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

APEX-Agents Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

8 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelXAGrok 4.6xAIScore57.5%Percentile100.0%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore37.6%Percentile85.7%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore33.8%Percentile71.4%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore33.5%Percentile57.1%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore29.2%Percentile42.9%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore27.9%Percentile28.6%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore27.7%Percentile14.3%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelTEHy3TencentScore25.6%Percentile0.0%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

APEX-Agents Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Grok 4.657.5%Rank #2Kimi K337.6%Rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro33.8%Rank #4Gemini 3.1 Pro33.5%

APEX-Agents Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

APEX-Agents

The Top AI Models for APEX-Agents

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis apex-agents AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    XA
    Grok 4.6xAI
    Score
    57.5%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 4.7 tok/s via xAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 8 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures APEX-Agents, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    Score
    37.6%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 26 tok/s via Fireworks

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 8 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures APEX-Agents, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    33.8%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 8 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures APEX-Agents, not total model capability
  4. 04
    GO
    Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle
    Score
    33.5%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 23 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 8 compared models
    • 57th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures APEX-Agents, not total model capability
  5. 05
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    29.2%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 8 compared models
    • 43th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures APEX-Agents, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for APEX-Agents

Grok 4.6 currently leads APEX-Agents with 57.5%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Grok 4.657.5% · $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Kimi K337.6% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro33.8%

What is APEX-Agents?

What APEX-Agents measures and how its scores work.

APEX-Agents is a benchmark evaluating AI agents on long horizon professional tasks that require sustained reasoning, planning, and execution across complex multi-step workflows.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
APEX-Agents
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
apex-agents|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about APEX-Agents.

Which model scores highest on APEX-Agents?

Grok 4.6 is currently ranked first with 57.5%.

What does APEX-Agents measure?

APEX-Agents is a benchmark evaluating AI agents on long horizon professional tasks that require sustained reasoning, planning, and execution across complex multi-step workflows.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

8 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.