reasoning benchmark
PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | MI | 37.1% | 100.0% | 5 | C | |
| 02 | MA | 36.6% | 75.0% | 5 | C | |
| 03 | ZA | 34.3% | 50.0% | 5 | C | |
| 04 | BY | 18.3% | 25.0% | 5 | C | |
| 05 | BY | 16.5% | 0.0% | 5 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What PostTrainBench measures and how its scores work.
PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about PostTrainBench.
MiniMax M3 is currently ranked first with 37.1%.
PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.