llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

PostTrainBench Leaderboard

PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models6
Model coverage6
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

PostTrainBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

6 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelZAGLM-5.3Zhipu AIScore39.8%Percentile100.0%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore37.1%Percentile80.0%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore36.6%Percentile60.0%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore34.3%Percentile40.0%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore18.3%Percentile20.0%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore16.5%Percentile0.0%Participants6EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

PostTrainBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1GLM-5.339.8%Rank #2MiniMax M337.1%Rank #3Kimi K336.6%Rank #4GLM-5.234.3%

PostTrainBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

PostTrainBench

The Top AI Models for PostTrainBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis posttrainbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ZA
    GLM-5.3Zhipu AI
    Score
    39.8%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 6 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MI
    MiniMax M3MiniMax
    Score
    37.1%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 214 tok/s via Together

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 6 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    Score
    36.6%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 26 tok/s via Fireworks

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 6 compared models
    • 60th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ZA
    GLM-5.2Zhipu AI
    Score
    34.3%
    Price
    $1.4 input / $4.4 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 6 compared models
    • 40th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    18.3%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 6 compared models
    • 20th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PostTrainBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for PostTrainBench

GLM-5.3 currently leads PostTrainBench with 39.8%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1GLM-5.339.8%Benchmark rank #2MiniMax M337.1% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Kimi K336.6% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens

What is PostTrainBench?

What PostTrainBench measures and how its scores work.

PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
PostTrainBench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
posttrainbench|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about PostTrainBench.

Which model scores highest on PostTrainBench?

GLM-5.3 is currently ranked first with 39.8%.

What does PostTrainBench measure?

PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

6 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.