llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Terminal-Bench 2.1

Terminal-Bench 2.1 is an updated release of the Terminal-Bench benchmark that tests AI agents' ability to operate a computer via the terminal. It evaluates how well models handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, data science workflows, and security tasks.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models19
Model coverage19
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

Terminal-Bench 2.1 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

19 rows
Columns

Show columns

01OPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI88.8%100.0%19CAug 11, 2026
02MAKimi K3Moonshot AI88.3%94.4%19CAug 11, 2026
03OPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI87.4%88.9%19CAug 11, 2026
04ACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team86.6%83.3%19CAug 11, 2026
05OPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI84.7%77.8%19CAug 11, 2026
06ANClaude Fable 5Anthropic84.3%72.2%19CAug 11, 2026
07XAGrok 4.5xAI83.3%66.7%19CAug 11, 2026
08MEMuse Spark 1.2Meta82.9%61.1%19CAug 11, 2026
09DEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731DeepSeek82.7%55.6%19CAug 11, 2026
10ZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AI82.7%50.0%19CAug 11, 2026
11MEMuse Spark 1.1Meta80.0%44.4%19CAug 11, 2026
12GOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogle78.0%38.9%19CAug 11, 2026
13TEHy3Tencent71.7%33.3%19CAug 11, 2026
14BYSeed 2.1 ProByteDance71.0%27.8%19CAug 11, 2026
15BYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance67.6%22.2%19CAug 11, 2026
16MIMiniMax M3MiniMax66.0%16.7%19CAug 11, 2026
17NVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIA56.4%11.1%19CAug 11, 2026
18GOGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle54.0%5.6%19CAug 11, 2026
19MEMuse Glimmer-30BMeta51.7%0.0%19CAug 11, 2026

Terminal-Bench 2.1 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Terminal-Bench 2.1

Terminal-Bench 2.1 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1GPT-5.6 Sol88.8%Rank #2Kimi K388.3%Rank #3GPT-5.6 Terra87.4%Rank #4Qwen3.8 Max86.6%

What is Terminal-Bench 2.1?

What Terminal-Bench 2.1 measures and how its scores work.

Terminal-Bench 2.1 is an updated release of the Terminal-Bench benchmark that tests AI agents' ability to operate a computer via the terminal. It evaluates how well models handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, data science workflows, and security tasks.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
terminal-bench-2.1|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Terminal-Bench 2.1.

Which model scores highest on Terminal-Bench 2.1?

GPT-5.6 Sol is currently ranked first with 88.8%.

What does Terminal-Bench 2.1 measure?

Terminal-Bench 2.1 is an updated release of the Terminal-Bench benchmark that tests AI agents' ability to operate a computer via the terminal. It evaluates how well models handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, data science workflows, and security tasks.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

19 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.