llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

SciCode Leaderboard

SciCode is a research coding benchmark curated by scientists that challenges language models to code solutions for scientific problems. It contains 338 subproblems decomposed from 80 challenging main problems across 16 natural science sub-fields including mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and materials science. Problems require knowledge recall, reasoning, and code synthesis skills.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models21
Model coverage21
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

SciCode Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

21 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore59.8%Percentile100.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore59.0%Percentile95.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore57.8%Percentile90.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore53.5%Percentile85.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore52.2%Percentile80.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore51.3%Percentile75.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelTMInkling-SmallThinking Machines LabScore48.7%Percentile70.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore48.7%Percentile65.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank09ModelMAKimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AIScore44.8%Percentile60.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank10ModelNVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIAScore44.6%Percentile55.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank11ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore43.6%Percentile50.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank12ModelNVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIAScore42.0%Percentile45.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank13ModelZAGLM-4.5Zhipu AIScore41.7%Percentile40.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank14ModelMIMiniMax M2.1MiniMaxScore39.0%Percentile35.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank15ModelCONorth Mini Code 1.0CohereScore38.2%Percentile30.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank16ModelCOCommand A+CohereScore38.0%Percentile25.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank17ModelINMercury 2InceptionScore38.0%Percentile20.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank18ModelZAGLM-4.5-AirZhipu AIScore37.3%Percentile15.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank19ModelMIMiniMax M2MiniMaxScore36.0%Percentile10.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank20ModelNVNemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore33.3%Percentile5.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank21ModelNVNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore32.6%Percentile0.0%Participants21EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

SciCode Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro59.8%Rank #2Gemini 3.1 Pro59.0%Rank #3Seed 2.1 Turbo57.8%Rank #4Qwen3.7 Max53.5%

SciCode Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

SciCode

The Top AI Models for SciCode

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis scicode AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    59.8%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 21 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle
    Score
    59.0%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 23 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 21 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    57.8%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 21 compared models
    • 90th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    53.5%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 5.8 tok/s via Together

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 21 compared models
    • 85th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MA
    Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
    Score
    52.2%
    Price
    $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 285 tok/s via Fireworks

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 21 compared models
    • 80th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SciCode, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for SciCode

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads SciCode with 59.8%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro59.8%Benchmark rank #2Gemini 3.1 Pro59.0% · $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Turbo57.8%

What is SciCode?

What SciCode measures and how its scores work.

SciCode is a research coding benchmark curated by scientists that challenges language models to code solutions for scientific problems. It contains 338 subproblems decomposed from 80 challenging main problems across 16 natural science sub-fields including mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and materials science. Problems require knowledge recall, reasoning, and code synthesis skills.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
SciCode
Modality
text
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
scicode|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about SciCode.

Which model scores highest on SciCode?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 59.8%.

What does SciCode measure?

SciCode is a research coding benchmark curated by scientists that challenges language models to code solutions for scientific problems. It contains 338 subproblems decomposed from 80 challenging main problems across 16 natural science sub-fields including mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, and materials science. Problems require knowledge recall, reasoning, and code synthesis skills.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

21 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.