llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

MathVerse Leaderboard

MathVerse evaluates multimodal mathematical reasoning, testing whether models genuinely interpret visual math diagrams rather than relying on text.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MathVerse Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore89.7%Percentile100.0%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore89.2%Percentile0.0%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

MathVerse Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro89.7%Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo89.2%

MathVerse Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MathVerse

The Top AI Models for MathVerse

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis mathverse AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    89.7%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MathVerse, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    89.2%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MathVerse, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MathVerse

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads MathVerse with 89.7%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro89.7%Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo89.2%

What is MathVerse?

What MathVerse measures and how its scores work.

MathVerse evaluates multimodal mathematical reasoning, testing whether models genuinely interpret visual math diagrams rather than relying on text.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MathVerse
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
mathverse|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MathVerse.

Which model scores highest on MathVerse?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 89.7%.

What does MathVerse measure?

MathVerse evaluates multimodal mathematical reasoning, testing whether models genuinely interpret visual math diagrams rather than relying on text.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.