llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

GameWorld Leaderboard

GameWorld evaluates agents on interactive game environments, testing perception, planning, and sequential decision-making to accomplish in-game objectives.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

GameWorld Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore31.2%Percentile100.0%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore25.9%Percentile0.0%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

GameWorld Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro31.2%Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo25.9%

GameWorld Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

GameWorld

The Top AI Models for GameWorld

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis gameworld AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    31.2%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures GameWorld, not total model capability
  2. 02
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    25.9%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures GameWorld, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for GameWorld

Seed 2.1 Pro currently leads GameWorld with 31.2%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro31.2%Benchmark rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo25.9%

What is GameWorld?

What GameWorld measures and how its scores work.

GameWorld evaluates agents on interactive game environments, testing perception, planning, and sequential decision-making to accomplish in-game objectives.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
GameWorld
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
gameworld|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about GameWorld.

Which model scores highest on GameWorld?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 31.2%.

What does GameWorld measure?

GameWorld evaluates agents on interactive game environments, testing perception, planning, and sequential decision-making to accomplish in-game objectives.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.