llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

MCP Atlas

MCP Atlas is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities, measuring how well models can coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models31
Model coverage31
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

MCP Atlas Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

31 rows
Columns

Show columns

01MEMuse Spark 1.1Meta88.1%100.0%31CAug 11, 2026
02MAKimi K3Moonshot AI84.2%96.7%31CAug 11, 2026
03BYSeed 2.1 ProByteDance83.8%93.3%31CAug 11, 2026
04GOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogle83.6%90.0%31CAug 11, 2026
05ANClaude Opus 4.8Anthropic82.2%86.7%31CAug 11, 2026
06BYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance80.3%83.3%31CAug 11, 2026
07TEHy3Tencent79.1%80.0%31CAug 11, 2026
08ANClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic77.3%76.7%31CAug 11, 2026
09ZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AI76.8%73.3%31CAug 11, 2026
10ACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team76.4%70.0%31CAug 11, 2026
11MAKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI76.0%66.7%31CAug 11, 2026
12MEMuse Glimmer-30BMeta75.5%63.3%31CAug 11, 2026
13OPGPT-5.5OpenAI75.3%60.0%31CAug 11, 2026
14MIMiniMax M3MiniMax74.2%56.7%31CAug 11, 2026
15ACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team74.1%53.3%31CAug 11, 2026
16DEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeek73.6%50.0%31CAug 11, 2026
17ACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team73.2%46.7%31CAug 11, 2026
18ZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AI71.8%43.3%31CAug 11, 2026
19GOGemini 3.1 ProGoogle69.2%40.0%31CAug 11, 2026
20DEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeek69.0%36.7%31CAug 11, 2026
21ZAGLM-5Zhipu AI67.8%33.3%31CAug 11, 2026
22OPGPT-5.4OpenAI67.2%30.0%31CAug 11, 2026
23ACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team62.8%26.7%31CAug 11, 2026
24ANClaude Opus 4.6Anthropic62.7%23.3%31CAug 11, 2026
25ANClaude Opus 4.5Anthropic62.3%20.0%31CAug 11, 2026
26ANClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic61.3%16.7%31CAug 11, 2026
27OPGPT-5.2OpenAI60.6%13.3%31CAug 11, 2026
28OPGPT-5.4 miniOpenAI57.7%10.0%31CAug 11, 2026
29GOGemini 3 FlashGoogle57.4%6.7%31CAug 11, 2026
30OPGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI56.1%3.3%31CAug 11, 2026
31AMNova 2 LiteAmazon24.6%0.0%31CAug 11, 2026

MCP Atlas Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MCP Atlas

MCP Atlas Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Muse Spark 1.188.1%Rank #2Kimi K384.2%Rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro83.8%Rank #4Gemini 3.5 Flash83.6%

What is MCP Atlas?

What MCP Atlas measures and how its scores work.

MCP Atlas is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities, measuring how well models can coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MCP Atlas
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
mcp-atlas|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MCP Atlas.

Which model scores highest on MCP Atlas?

Muse Spark 1.1 is currently ranked first with 88.1%.

What does MCP Atlas measure?

MCP Atlas is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities, measuring how well models can coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

31 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.