llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

MCP Atlas Leaderboard

MCP Atlas is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities, measuring how well models can coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models33
Model coverage33
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MCP Atlas Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 33 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMEMuse Spark 1.1MetaScore88.1%Percentile100.0%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore84.2%Percentile96.9%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore83.8%Percentile93.8%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleScore83.6%Percentile90.6%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.8AnthropicScore82.2%Percentile87.5%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore80.3%Percentile84.4%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelTMInkling-SmallThinking Machines LabScore79.6%Percentile81.3%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelTEHy3TencentScore79.1%Percentile78.1%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank09ModelANClaude Opus 4.7AnthropicScore77.3%Percentile75.0%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank10ModelZAGLM-5.2Zhipu AIScore76.8%Percentile71.9%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank11ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore76.4%Percentile68.8%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank12ModelMAKimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AIScore76.0%Percentile65.6%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank13ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore75.5%Percentile62.5%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank14ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore75.3%Percentile59.4%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank15ModelMIMiniMax M3MiniMaxScore74.2%Percentile56.3%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore74.1%Percentile53.1%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank17ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeekScore73.6%Percentile50.0%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore73.2%Percentile46.9%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank19ModelZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AIScore71.8%Percentile43.8%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank20ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore69.2%Percentile40.6%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank21ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeekScore69.0%Percentile37.5%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank22ModelZAGLM-5Zhipu AIScore67.8%Percentile34.4%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank23ModelDEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0423DeepSeekScore67.4%Percentile31.3%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank24ModelOPGPT-5.4OpenAIScore67.2%Percentile28.1%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank25ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore62.8%Percentile25.0%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank26ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore62.7%Percentile21.9%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank27ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicScore62.3%Percentile18.8%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank28ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicScore61.3%Percentile15.6%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank29ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIScore60.6%Percentile12.5%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank30ModelOPGPT-5.4 miniOpenAIScore57.7%Percentile9.4%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank31ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleScore57.4%Percentile6.3%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank32ModelOPGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIScore56.1%Percentile3.1%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank33ModelAMNova 2 LiteAmazonScore24.6%Percentile0.0%Participants33EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

MCP Atlas Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Muse Spark 1.188.1%Rank #2Kimi K384.2%Rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro83.8%Rank #4Gemini 3.5 Flash83.6%

MCP Atlas Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MCP Atlas

The Top AI Models for MCP Atlas

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis mcp atlas AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    ME
    Muse Spark 1.1Meta
    Score
    88.1%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.2 tok/s via Meta Model API

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 33 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    Score
    84.2%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 26 tok/s via Fireworks

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 33 compared models
    • 97th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    83.8%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 33 compared models
    • 94th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability
  4. 04
    GO
    Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle
    Score
    83.6%
    Price
    $1.5 input / $9.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 1.2 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 33 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
    Score
    82.2%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 46 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 33 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MCP Atlas, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MCP Atlas

Muse Spark 1.1 currently leads MCP Atlas with 88.1%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Muse Spark 1.188.1% · $1.3 input / $4.3 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Kimi K384.2% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro83.8%

What is MCP Atlas?

What MCP Atlas measures and how its scores work.

MCP Atlas is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities, measuring how well models can coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MCP Atlas
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
mcp-atlas|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MCP Atlas.

Which model scores highest on MCP Atlas?

Muse Spark 1.1 is currently ranked first with 88.1%.

What does MCP Atlas measure?

MCP Atlas is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on scaled tool use capabilities, measuring how well models can coordinate and utilize multiple tools across complex multi-step tasks.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

33 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.