llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

ZEROBench Leaderboard

ZEROBench is a challenging vision benchmark designed to test models on zero-shot visual understanding tasks.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models9
Model coverage9
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

ZEROBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

9 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAKimi K3Moonshot AIScore0.41 pointsPercentile100.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelMEMuse SparkMetaScore0.33 pointsPercentile87.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore0.18 pointsPercentile75.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelMAKimi K2.5Moonshot AIScore0.11 pointsPercentile62.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore0.11 pointsPercentile50.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.1 pointsPercentile37.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.09 pointsPercentile25.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.08 pointsPercentile12.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank09ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.04 pointsPercentile0.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

ZEROBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Kimi K30.41 pointsRank #2Muse Spark0.33 pointsRank #3Seed 2.1 Pro0.18 pointsRank #4Kimi K2.50.11 points

ZEROBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

ZEROBench

The Top AI Models for ZEROBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis zerobench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Kimi K3Moonshot AI
    Score
    0.41 points
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 26 tok/s via Fireworks

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 9 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ME
    Muse SparkMeta
    Score
    0.33 points

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 9 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    BY
    Seed 2.1 ProByteDance
    Score
    0.18 points

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 9 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    MA
    Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
    Score
    0.11 points
    Price
    $0.60 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 9 compared models
    • 63th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    BY
    Seed 2.1 TurboByteDance
    Score
    0.11 points

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 9 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for ZEROBench

Kimi K3 currently leads ZEROBench with 0.41 points. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Kimi K30.41 points · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Muse Spark0.33 pointsBenchmark rank #3Seed 2.1 Pro0.18 points

What is ZEROBench?

What ZEROBench measures and how its scores work.

ZEROBench is a challenging vision benchmark designed to test models on zero-shot visual understanding tasks.

Scores are shown in points. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
ZEROBench
Modality
image
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
zerobench|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about ZEROBench.

Which model scores highest on ZEROBench?

Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 0.41 points.

What does ZEROBench measure?

ZEROBench is a challenging vision benchmark designed to test models on zero-shot visual understanding tasks.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

9 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.