reasoning benchmark
FrontierCS
FrontierCS is a benchmark of frontier computer-science problems requiring deep theoretical understanding and rigorous multi-step reasoning at the edge of the field.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB
FrontierCS Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | BY | 50.8% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 02 | BY | 46.3% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
FrontierCS Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
FrontierCS Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is FrontierCS?
What FrontierCS measures and how its scores work.
FrontierCS is a benchmark of frontier computer-science problems requiring deep theoretical understanding and rigorous multi-step reasoning at the edge of the field.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- FrontierCS
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- reasoning
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- frontiercs|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about FrontierCS.
Which model scores highest on FrontierCS?
Seed 2.1 Turbo is currently ranked first with 50.8%.
What does FrontierCS measure?
FrontierCS is a benchmark of frontier computer-science problems requiring deep theoretical understanding and rigorous multi-step reasoning at the edge of the field.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
2 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.