llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

BrowseComp

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models58
Model coverage58
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

BrowseComp Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

58 rows
Columns

Show columns

01MAKimi K3Moonshot AI91.2%100.0%58CAug 11, 2026
02ANClaude Opus 5Anthropic90.8%98.3%58CAug 11, 2026
03OPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI90.4%96.5%58CAug 11, 2026
04OPGPT-5.5 ProOpenAI90.1%94.7%58CAug 11, 2026
05OPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI87.5%93.0%58CAug 11, 2026
06ANClaude Mythos PreviewAnthropic86.9%91.2%58CAug 11, 2026
07MAKimi K2.6Moonshot AI86.3%89.5%58CAug 11, 2026
08BYSeed 2.1 ProByteDance86.2%87.7%58CAug 11, 2026
09GOGemini 3.1 ProGoogle85.9%86.0%58CAug 11, 2026
10BYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance84.9%84.2%58CAug 11, 2026
11ANClaude Sonnet 5Anthropic84.7%82.5%58CAug 11, 2026
12OPGPT-5.5OpenAI84.4%80.7%58CAug 11, 2026
13ANClaude Opus 4.8Anthropic84.3%79.0%58CAug 11, 2026
14TEHy3Tencent84.2%77.2%58CAug 11, 2026
15ANClaude Opus 4.6Anthropic84.0%75.4%58CAug 11, 2026
16MIMiniMax M3MiniMax83.5%73.7%58CAug 11, 2026
17DEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeek83.4%71.9%58CAug 11, 2026
18OPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI83.3%70.2%58CAug 11, 2026
19OPGPT-5.4OpenAI82.7%68.4%58CAug 11, 2026
20ANClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic79.3%66.7%58CAug 11, 2026
21ZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AI79.3%64.9%58CAug 11, 2026
22OPGPT-5.2 ProOpenAI77.9%63.2%58CAug 11, 2026
23BYSeed 2.0 ProByteDance77.3%61.4%58CAug 11, 2026
24MIMiniMax M2.5MiniMax76.3%59.6%58CAug 11, 2026
25ZAGLM-5Zhipu AI75.9%57.9%58CAug 11, 2026
26MAKimi K2.5Moonshot AI74.9%56.1%58CAug 11, 2026
27ANClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic74.7%54.4%58CAug 11, 2026
28DEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeek73.2%52.6%58CAug 11, 2026
29ACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team69.0%50.9%58CAug 11, 2026
30STStep-3.5-FlashStepFun69.0%49.1%58CAug 11, 2026
31OPGPT-5.2OpenAI65.8%47.4%58CAug 11, 2026
32ACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team63.8%45.6%58CAug 11, 2026
33MIMiniMax M2.1MiniMax62.0%43.9%58CAug 11, 2026
34ACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team61.0%42.1%58CAug 11, 2026
35ACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team61.0%40.4%58CAug 11, 2026
36MAKimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AI60.2%38.6%58CAug 11, 2026
37XIMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomi58.3%36.8%58CAug 11, 2026
38MELongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601Meituan56.6%35.1%58CAug 11, 2026
39OPGPT-5OpenAI54.9%33.3%58CAug 11, 2026
40ZAGLM-4.7Zhipu AI52.0%31.6%58CAug 11, 2026
41OPo4-miniOpenAI51.5%29.8%58CAug 11, 2026
42DEDeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)DeepSeek51.4%28.1%58CAug 11, 2026
43DEDeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeek51.4%26.3%58CAug 11, 2026
44OPo3OpenAI49.7%24.6%58CAug 11, 2026
45SASarvam-105BSarvam AI49.5%22.8%58CAug 11, 2026
46MAMistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI48.6%21.1%58CAug 11, 2026
47ZAGLM-4.6Zhipu AI45.1%19.3%58CAug 11, 2026
48XAGrok 4 FastxAI44.9%17.5%58CAug 11, 2026
49NVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIA44.4%15.8%58CAug 11, 2026
50MIMiniMax M2MiniMax44.0%14.0%58CAug 11, 2026
51ZAGLM-4.7-FlashZhipu AI42.8%12.3%58CAug 11, 2026
52DEDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDeepSeek40.1%10.5%58CAug 11, 2026
53SASarvam-30BSarvam AI35.5%8.8%58CAug 11, 2026
54NVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIA31.3%7.0%58CAug 11, 2026
55DEDeepSeek-V3.1DeepSeek30.0%5.3%58CAug 11, 2026
56ZAGLM-4.5Zhipu AI26.4%3.5%58CAug 11, 2026
57ZAGLM-4.5-AirZhipu AI21.3%1.8%58CAug 11, 2026
58DEDeepSeek-R1-0528DeepSeek8.9%0.0%58CAug 11, 2026

BrowseComp Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

BrowseComp

BrowseComp Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Kimi K391.2%Rank #2Claude Opus 590.8%Rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol90.4%Rank #4GPT-5.5 Pro90.1%

What is BrowseComp?

What BrowseComp measures and how its scores work.

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
BrowseComp
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
browsecomp|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about BrowseComp.

Which model scores highest on BrowseComp?

Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 91.2%.

What does BrowseComp measure?

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

58 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.