llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

spatial reasoning benchmark

EmbSpatialBench Leaderboard

EmbSpatialBench evaluates embodied spatial understanding and reasoning capabilities.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models8
Model coverage8
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

EmbSpatialBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

8 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.846 pointsPercentile100.0%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.845 pointsPercentile85.7%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.843 pointsPercentile71.4%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.843 pointsPercentile57.1%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.839 pointsPercentile42.9%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelBYSeed 2.1 ProByteDanceScore0.834 pointsPercentile28.6%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.831 pointsPercentile14.3%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelBYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDanceScore0.825 pointsPercentile0.0%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

EmbSpatialBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Qwen3.6-27B0.846 pointsRank #2Qwen3.5-27B0.845 pointsRank #3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking0.843 pointsRank #4Qwen3.6-35B-A3B0.843 points

EmbSpatialBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

EmbSpatialBench

The Top AI Models for EmbSpatialBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis embspatialbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.846 points
    Price
    $0.60 input / $3.6 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.1 tok/s via Novita

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 8 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures EmbSpatialBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.845 points
    Price
    $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.7 tok/s via Novita

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 8 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures EmbSpatialBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.843 points

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 8 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures EmbSpatialBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.843 points
    Price
    $0.25 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 8 compared models
    • 57th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures EmbSpatialBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.839 points
    Price
    $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 8 compared models
    • 43th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures EmbSpatialBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for EmbSpatialBench

Qwen3.6-27B currently leads EmbSpatialBench with 0.846 points. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.6-27B0.846 points · $0.60 input / $3.6 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Qwen3.5-27B0.845 points · $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking0.843 points

What is EmbSpatialBench?

What EmbSpatialBench measures and how its scores work.

EmbSpatialBench evaluates embodied spatial understanding and reasoning capabilities.

Scores are shown in points. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
EmbSpatialBench
Modality
image
Primary category
spatial reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
embspatialbench|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about EmbSpatialBench.

Which model scores highest on EmbSpatialBench?

Qwen3.6-27B is currently ranked first with 0.846 points.

What does EmbSpatialBench measure?

EmbSpatialBench evaluates embodied spatial understanding and reasoning capabilities.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

8 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.