spatial reasoning benchmark
EmbSpatialBench evaluates embodied spatial understanding and reasoning capabilities.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 0.846 points | 100.0% | 8 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 0.845 points | 85.7% | 8 | C | |
| 03 | AC | 0.843 points | 71.4% | 8 | C | |
| 04 | AC | 0.843 points | 57.1% | 8 | C | |
| 05 | AC | 0.839 points | 42.9% | 8 | C | |
| 06 | BY | 0.834 points | 28.6% | 8 | C | |
| 07 | AC | 0.831 points | 14.3% | 8 | C | |
| 08 | BY | 0.825 points | 0.0% | 8 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What EmbSpatialBench measures and how its scores work.
EmbSpatialBench evaluates embodied spatial understanding and reasoning capabilities.
Scores are shown in points. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about EmbSpatialBench.
Qwen3.6-27B is currently ranked first with 0.846 points.
EmbSpatialBench evaluates embodied spatial understanding and reasoning capabilities.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
8 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.