llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

MRCR v2 (8-needle) Leaderboard

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models23
Model coverage23
MetricScore
EvidenceC

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MRCR v2 (8-needle) Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

23 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelGOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogleScore97.0%Percentile100.0%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore92.9%Percentile95.5%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelOPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAIScore91.5%Percentile90.9%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelOPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIScore89.6%Percentile86.4%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore76.0%Percentile81.8%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.5OpenAIScore74.0%Percentile77.3%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelGOGemma 4 31BGoogleScore66.4%Percentile72.7%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelGOGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogleScore60.1%Percentile68.2%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank09ModelGOGemini 3.6 FlashGoogleScore54.0%Percentile63.6%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank10ModelGOGemma 4 26B-A4BGoogleScore44.1%Percentile59.1%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank11ModelGOGemma 4 12BGoogleScore43.4%Percentile54.5%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank12ModelOPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIScore41.3%Percentile50.0%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank13ModelOPGPT-5.4 miniOpenAIScore33.6%Percentile45.5%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank14ModelOPGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAIScore33.1%Percentile40.9%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank15ModelGOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogleScore26.6%Percentile36.4%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank16ModelGOGemini 3 ProGoogleScore26.3%Percentile31.8%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank17ModelGOGemini 3.1 ProGoogleScore26.3%Percentile27.3%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank18ModelGOGemma 4 E4BGoogleScore25.4%Percentile22.7%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank19ModelGOGemini 3 FlashGoogleScore22.1%Percentile18.2%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank20ModelGOGemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogleScore21.3%Percentile13.6%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank21ModelGOGemma 4 E2BGoogleScore19.1%Percentile9.1%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank22ModelGOGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05GoogleScore16.4%Percentile4.5%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank23ModelGOGemma 3 27BGoogleScore13.5%Percentile0.0%Participants23EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

MRCR v2 (8-needle) Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Gemini 3.7 Flash97.0%Rank #2Qwen3.8 Max92.9%Rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol91.5%Rank #4GPT-5.6 Terra89.6%

MRCR v2 (8-needle) Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MRCR v2 (8-needle)

The Top AI Models for MRCR v2 (8-needle)

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis mrcr v2 (8-needle) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    GO
    Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
    Score
    97.0%
    Price
    $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 13 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 23 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR v2 (8-needle), not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    92.9%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 23 compared models
    • 95th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR v2 (8-needle), not total model capability
  3. 03
    OP
    GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
    Score
    91.5%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 27 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 23 compared models
    • 91th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR v2 (8-needle), not total model capability
  4. 04
    OP
    GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
    Score
    89.6%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 35 tok/s via OpenAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 23 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR v2 (8-needle), not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
    Score
    76.0%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 17 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 23 compared models
    • 82th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR v2 (8-needle), not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MRCR v2 (8-needle)

Gemini 3.7 Flash currently leads MRCR v2 (8-needle) with 97.0%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Gemini 3.7 Flash97.0% · $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Qwen3.8 Max92.9% · $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol91.5% · $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens

What is MRCR v2 (8-needle)?

What MRCR v2 (8-needle) measures and how its scores work.

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of C.

Family
MRCR v2 (8-needle)
Modality
text
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
mrcr-v2-(8-needle)|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MRCR v2 (8-needle).

Which model scores highest on MRCR v2 (8-needle)?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is currently ranked first with 97.0%.

What does MRCR v2 (8-needle) measure?

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

23 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.