reasoning benchmark
A benchmark evaluating language models' ability to generate factually accurate and well-grounded responses based on long-form input context, comprising 1,719 examples with documents up to 32k tokens requiring detailed responses that are fully grounded in provided documents
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelGO | Score87.8% | Percentile100.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelGO | Score85.3% | Percentile91.7% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelGO | Score84.1% | Percentile83.3% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelGO | Score83.6% | Percentile75.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelGO | Score83.6% | Percentile66.7% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelGO | Score75.8% | Percentile58.3% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelGO | Score74.9% | Percentile50.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelGO | Score70.5% | Percentile41.7% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelGO | Score70.1% | Percentile33.3% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelGO | Score61.9% | Percentile25.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelZA | Score58.6% | Percentile16.7% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelGO | Score40.6% | Percentile8.3% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelGO | Score36.4% | Percentile0.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis facts grounding AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 currently leads FACTS Grounding with 87.8%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What FACTS Grounding measures and how its scores work.
A benchmark evaluating language models' ability to generate factually accurate and well-grounded responses based on long-form input context, comprising 1,719 examples with documents up to 32k tokens requiring detailed responses that are fully grounded in provided documents
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of C.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about FACTS Grounding.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is currently ranked first with 87.8%.
A benchmark evaluating language models' ability to generate factually accurate and well-grounded responses based on long-form input context, comprising 1,719 examples with documents up to 32k tokens requiring detailed responses that are fully grounded in provided documents
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.