llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

Cointegrated model product

LaBSE-en-ru

Ranked model from MTEB.

Updated Aug 18, 2026. Default version: LaBSE-en-ru

Compare
LLMBoard Embedding Score17.0LaBSE-en-ru
Coverage85%5 benchmark families
Context window512Tokens
Official input priceN/AOfficial price unavailable

On this page

  • Capability
  • Benchmarks
  • Arena
  • Pricing
  • Runtime
  • Specification
  • Versions
  • Compare
  • Similar models
  • About
  • FAQ

LaBSE-en-ru Capability Profile

This profile uses the model's current scored version. Arena ratings and prices are shown separately.

LaBSE-en-ru LLMBoard score breakdown

LaBSE-en-ru Benchmark Results

Benchmark scores for LaBSE-en-ru.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Benchmark
Score
Rank
Participants
Percentile
Evidence
Evaluated
BenchmarkMTEB(eng, v2) Semantic SimilarityScore70.1%Rank186Participants207PercentileN/AEvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
BenchmarkMTEB(eng, v2) ClusteringScore36.7%Rank188Participants213PercentileN/AEvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
BenchmarkMTEB(eng, v2) RetrievalScore16.6%Rank192Participants208PercentileN/AEvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
BenchmarkMTEB(eng, v2) RerankingScore41.1%Rank210Participants237PercentileN/AEvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
BenchmarkMTEB(eng, v2) ClassificationScore72.5%Rank219Participants253PercentileN/AEvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026

LaBSE-en-ru Arena Results

Preference and agent-evaluation results for the default version.

No Arena results

The default version does not have a matching Arena result yet.

LaBSE-en-ru Pricing

Official vendor API pricing appears first, followed by individual provider offers.

Official API
N/A
Official provider
N/A
Lowest third-party
N/A
Tracked offerings
0
No provider prices

The default version has no current input or output token prices.

Official prices use only the vendor's configured official Provider and positive standard USD PAYG rates. Third-party offers remain explicitly labeled.

LaBSE-en-ru Runtime Performance

Provider-specific output speed and catalog latency for LaBSE-en-ru. Runtime does not affect the capability score.

No runtime data

No provider-specific speed or latency record is linked to the default version yet.

Browse runtime rankings

Output Speed is generated output tokens received per second. Catalog latency is reported separately from observed provider TTFT.

LaBSE-en-ru Specifications

Technical details for the model's default version.

Version
LaBSE-en-ru
Released
Jun 10, 2021
Knowledge cutoff
Unknown
Parameters
129M
Context window
512
Max output
N/A
Inputs
text
Outputs
embedding
Open weights
Yes
License
not specified

LaBSE-en-ru Versions

Available versions of this model. The score column identifies the version used in the overall ranking.

1 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Version
Released
LLMBoard
Parameters
Context
Max output
Open weights
License
VersionLaBSE-en-ruReleasedJun 10, 2021LLMBoard17.0Parameters129MContext512Max outputN/AOpen weightsYesLicensenot specified

LaBSE-en-ru vs nearby models

Open a comparison with the three ranked models immediately above and below this model.

LaBSE-en-ruvsM2V_base_glove_subwordLaBSE-en-ruvsUSER-baseLaBSE-en-ruvsM2V_base_outputLaBSE-en-ruvspotion-base-2MLaBSE-en-ruvsgemma-2b-embeddingsLaBSE-en-ruvsrubert-tiny-turbo

Models similar to LaBSE-en-ru

Recommendations prioritize the same model type and family, then the closest LLMBoard score.

#337-3.2
CO

rubert-tiny2

Cointegrated

13.8 LLMBoard

DetailsCompare
#339-4.2
CO

rubert-tiny

Cointegrated

12.8 LLMBoard

DetailsCompare
#332+0.1
MI

M2V_base_output

Minishlab

17.1 LLMBoard

DetailsCompare
#331+0.2
DE

USER-base

Deepvk

17.2 LLMBoard

DetailsCompare
#334-0.2
MI

potion-base-2M

Minishlab

16.9 LLMBoard

DetailsCompare
#330+0.9
MI

M2V_base_glove_subword

Minishlab

17.9 LLMBoard

DetailsCompare

What is LaBSE-en-ru?

Key information about LaBSE-en-ru and its available data.

Ranked model from MTEB.

Data as of 2026-08-17.

FAQ

Common questions about LaBSE-en-ru.

When was LaBSE-en-ru released?

LaBSE-en-ru's default version was released on Jun 10, 2021.

How much does LaBSE-en-ru cost?

No official standard PAYG price is currently available for LaBSE-en-ru.

Who created LaBSE-en-ru?

LaBSE-en-ru was created by Cointegrated.

What is the context window for LaBSE-en-ru?

The default version has a 512 token context window.

Is LaBSE-en-ru open weight?

Yes. The default version is marked as open weight under not specified.

How many API providers offer LaBSE-en-ru?

No provider offering is currently linked to the default version.

What models should I compare LaBSE-en-ru with?

Nearby ranked alternatives include M2V_base_glove_subword, USER-base, M2V_base_output.