llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

ZEROBench-Sub Leaderboard

ZEROBench-Sub is a subset of the ZEROBench benchmark.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

ZEROBench-Sub Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

5 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.362 pointsPercentile100.0%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.362 pointsPercentile75.0%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.344 pointsPercentile50.0%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.341 pointsPercentile25.0%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore0.277 pointsPercentile0.0%Participants5EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

ZEROBench-Sub Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Qwen3.5-122B-A10B0.362 pointsRank #2Qwen3.5-27B0.362 pointsRank #3Qwen3.6-35B-A3B0.344 pointsRank #4Qwen3.5-35B-A3B0.341 points

ZEROBench-Sub Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

ZEROBench-Sub

The Top AI Models for ZEROBench-Sub

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis zerobench-sub AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.362 points
    Price
    $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 5 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench-Sub, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.362 points
    Price
    $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.7 tok/s via Novita

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 5 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench-Sub, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.344 points
    Price
    $0.25 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 5 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench-Sub, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.341 points
    Price
    $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 5 compared models
    • 25th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench-Sub, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    0.277 points

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 5 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures ZEROBench-Sub, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for ZEROBench-Sub

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B currently leads ZEROBench-Sub with 0.362 points. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.5-122B-A10B0.362 points · $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Qwen3.5-27B0.362 points · $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Qwen3.6-35B-A3B0.344 points · $0.25 input / $1.5 output per 1M tokens

What is ZEROBench-Sub?

What ZEROBench-Sub measures and how its scores work.

ZEROBench-Sub is a subset of the ZEROBench benchmark.

Scores are shown in points. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
ZEROBench-Sub
Modality
image
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
zerobench-sub|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about ZEROBench-Sub.

Which model scores highest on ZEROBench-Sub?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is currently ranked first with 0.362 points.

What does ZEROBench-Sub measure?

ZEROBench-Sub is a subset of the ZEROBench benchmark.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

5 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.