reasoning benchmark
ZebraLogic is an evaluation framework for assessing large language models' logical reasoning capabilities through logic grid puzzles derived from constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). The benchmark consists of 1,000 programmatically generated puzzles with controllable and quantifiable complexity, revealing a 'curse of complexity' where model accuracy declines significantly as problem complexity grows.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score97.3% | Percentile100.0% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelME | Score95.5% | Percentile85.7% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score95.0% | Percentile71.4% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelME | Score89.3% | Percentile57.1% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelMA | Score89.0% | Percentile42.9% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelMA | Score89.0% | Percentile28.6% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelMI | Score86.8% | Percentile14.3% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelMI | Score80.1% | Percentile0.0% | Participants8 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis zebralogic AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking currently leads ZebraLogic with 97.3%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What ZebraLogic measures and how its scores work.
ZebraLogic is an evaluation framework for assessing large language models' logical reasoning capabilities through logic grid puzzles derived from constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). The benchmark consists of 1,000 programmatically generated puzzles with controllable and quantifiable complexity, revealing a 'curse of complexity' where model accuracy declines significantly as problem complexity grows.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about ZebraLogic.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is currently ranked first with 97.3%.
ZebraLogic is an evaluation framework for assessing large language models' logical reasoning capabilities through logic grid puzzles derived from constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). The benchmark consists of 1,000 programmatically generated puzzles with controllable and quantifiable complexity, revealing a 'curse of complexity' where model accuracy declines significantly as problem complexity grows.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
8 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.