reasoning benchmark
Vending-Bench 2 tests longer horizon planning capabilities by evaluating how well AI models can manage a simulated vending machine business over extended periods. The benchmark measures a model's ability to maintain consistent tool usage and decision-making for a full simulated year of operation, driving higher returns without drifting off task.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher final balance ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AN | 8,017.59 usd | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 02 | ZA | 5,634.41 usd | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 03 | GO | 5,478.16 usd | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 04 | GO | 3,635 usd | 0.0% | 4 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What Vending-Bench 2 measures and how its scores work.
Vending-Bench 2 tests longer horizon planning capabilities by evaluating how well AI models can manage a simulated vending machine business over extended periods. The benchmark measures a model's ability to maintain consistent tool usage and decision-making for a full simulated year of operation, driving higher returns without drifting off task.
Scores are shown in usd. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Vending-Bench 2.
Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 8,017.59 usd.
Vending-Bench 2 tests longer horizon planning capabilities by evaluating how well AI models can manage a simulated vending machine business over extended periods. The benchmark measures a model's ability to maintain consistent tool usage and decision-making for a full simulated year of operation, driving higher returns without drifting off task.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.