reasoning benchmark
Vending-Bench 2 tests longer horizon planning capabilities by evaluating how well AI models can manage a simulated vending machine business over extended periods. The benchmark measures a model's ability to maintain consistent tool usage and decision-making for a full simulated year of operation, driving higher returns without drifting off task.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher final balance ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Final balance | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Final balance8,017.59 usd | Percentile100.0% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelZA | Final balance5,634.41 usd | Percentile66.7% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelGO | Final balance5,478.16 usd | Percentile33.3% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelGO | Final balance3,635 usd | Percentile0.0% | Participants4 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis vending-bench 2 AI model leaderboard uses descending final balance in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Opus 4.6 currently leads Vending-Bench 2 with 8,017.59 usd. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What Vending-Bench 2 measures and how its scores work.
Vending-Bench 2 tests longer horizon planning capabilities by evaluating how well AI models can manage a simulated vending machine business over extended periods. The benchmark measures a model's ability to maintain consistent tool usage and decision-making for a full simulated year of operation, driving higher returns without drifting off task.
Scores are shown in usd. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Vending-Bench 2.
Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 8,017.59 usd.
Vending-Bench 2 tests longer horizon planning capabilities by evaluating how well AI models can manage a simulated vending machine business over extended periods. The benchmark measures a model's ability to maintain consistent tool usage and decision-making for a full simulated year of operation, driving higher returns without drifting off task.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.