llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Terminal-Bench 2.0

Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models49
Model coverage49
MetricScore
EvidenceC

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

Terminal-Bench 2.0 Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

49 rows
Columns

Show columns

01OPGPT-5.5OpenAI82.7%100.0%49CAug 11, 2026
02ANClaude Mythos PreviewAnthropic82.0%97.9%49CAug 11, 2026
03ANClaude Sonnet 5Anthropic80.4%95.8%49CAug 11, 2026
04OPGPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI77.3%93.8%49CAug 11, 2026
05GOGemini 3.5 FlashGoogle76.2%91.7%49CAug 11, 2026
06OPGPT-5.4OpenAI75.1%89.6%49CAug 11, 2026
07ANClaude Opus 4.8Anthropic74.6%87.5%49CAug 11, 2026
08ACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team70.3%85.4%49CAug 11, 2026
09ACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team69.7%83.3%49CAug 11, 2026
10ANClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic69.4%81.3%49CAug 11, 2026
11ZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AI69.0%79.2%49CAug 11, 2026
12GOGemini 3.1 ProGoogle68.5%77.1%49CAug 11, 2026
13XIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi68.4%75.0%49CAug 11, 2026
14DEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeek67.9%72.9%49CAug 11, 2026
15MAKimi K2.6Moonshot AI66.7%70.8%49CAug 11, 2026
16XIMiMo-V2.5Xiaomi65.8%68.8%49CAug 11, 2026
17ANClaude Opus 4.6Anthropic65.4%66.7%49CAug 11, 2026
18OPGPT-5.2 CodexOpenAI64.0%64.6%49CAug 11, 2026
19ACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team61.6%62.5%49CAug 11, 2026
20OPGPT-5.4 miniOpenAI60.0%60.4%49CAug 11, 2026
21ANClaude Opus 4.5Anthropic59.3%58.3%49CAug 11, 2026
22ACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team59.3%56.3%49CAug 11, 2026
23ANClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic59.1%54.2%49CAug 11, 2026
24MEMuse SparkMeta59.0%52.1%49CAug 11, 2026
25XIMiMo-V2-ProXiaomi57.1%50.0%49CAug 11, 2026
26MIMiniMax M2.7MiniMax57.0%47.9%49CAug 11, 2026
27DEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeek56.9%45.8%49CAug 11, 2026
28ZAGLM-5Zhipu AI56.2%43.8%49CAug 11, 2026
29MIMAI-Code-1-FlashMicrosoft54.8%41.7%49CAug 11, 2026
30GOGemini 3 ProGoogle54.2%39.6%49CAug 11, 2026
31OPGPT-5.1 CodexOpenAI52.8%37.5%49CAug 11, 2026
32ACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team52.5%35.4%49CAug 11, 2026
33ACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team51.5%33.3%49CAug 11, 2026
34STStep-3.5-FlashStepFun51.0%31.3%49CAug 11, 2026
35MAKimi K2.5Moonshot AI50.8%29.2%49CAug 11, 2026
36ACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team49.4%27.1%49CAug 11, 2026
37GOGemini 3 FlashGoogle47.6%25.0%49CAug 11, 2026
38DEDeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)DeepSeek46.4%22.9%49CAug 11, 2026
39DEDeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeek46.4%20.8%49CAug 11, 2026
40DEDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeDeepSeek46.4%18.8%49CAug 11, 2026
41OPGPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI46.3%16.7%49CAug 11, 2026
42MIMAI-Thinking-1Microsoft46.0%14.6%49CAug 11, 2026
43ACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team41.6%12.5%49CAug 11, 2026
44ZAGLM-4.7Zhipu AI41.0%10.4%49CAug 11, 2026
45ACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team40.5%8.3%49CAug 11, 2026
46XIMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomi38.5%6.3%49CAug 11, 2026
47ACQwen3-Coder 480B A35B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team37.5%4.2%49CAug 11, 2026
48CONorth Mini Code 1.0Cohere36.0%2.1%49CAug 11, 2026
49NVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIA31.0%0.0%49CAug 11, 2026

Terminal-Bench 2.0 Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Terminal-Bench 2.0

Terminal-Bench 2.0 Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1GPT-5.582.7%Rank #2Claude Mythos Preview82.0%Rank #3Claude Sonnet 580.4%Rank #4GPT-5.3 Codex77.3%

What is Terminal-Bench 2.0?

What Terminal-Bench 2.0 measures and how its scores work.

Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of C.

Family
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
terminal-bench-2|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Terminal-Bench 2.0.

Which model scores highest on Terminal-Bench 2.0?

GPT-5.5 is currently ranked first with 82.7%.

What does Terminal-Bench 2.0 measure?

Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

49 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.