multimodal benchmark
TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 74.8% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 71.7% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What TempCompass measures and how its scores work.
TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about TempCompass.
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 74.8%.
TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.