llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Tau3 Banking Leaderboard

τ³-Bench banking domain evaluates agentic models on multi-turn, tool-using customer-support scenarios in a simulated retail banking environment.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models7
Model coverage7
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Tau3 Banking Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

7 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelXAGrok 4.5xAIScore33.0%Percentile100.0%Participants7EvidenceBEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore23.5%Percentile83.3%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelUPSolar Pro 4UpstageScore23.0%Percentile66.7%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelTMInkling-SmallThinking Machines LabScore15.5%Percentile50.0%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelMAMistral Medium 3.5Mistral AIScore13.4%Percentile33.3%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelNVNemotron 3.5 Lightning (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore9.3%Percentile16.7%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelLALFM2.5-2.6BLiquid AIScore5.7%Percentile0.0%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

Tau3 Banking Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Grok 4.533.0%Rank #2Muse Glimmer-30B23.5%Rank #3Solar Pro 423.0%Rank #4Inkling-Small15.5%

Tau3 Banking Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Tau3 Banking

The Top AI Models for Tau3 Banking

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis tau3 banking AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    XA
    Grok 4.5xAI
    Score
    33.0%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 4.3 tok/s via xAI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 7 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • B evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau3 Banking, not total model capability
  2. 02
    ME
    Muse Glimmer-30BMeta
    Score
    23.5%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 7 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau3 Banking, not total model capability
  3. 03
    UP
    Solar Pro 4Upstage
    Score
    23.0%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 7 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau3 Banking, not total model capability
  4. 04
    TM
    Inkling-SmallThinking Machines Lab
    Score
    15.5%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 7 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau3 Banking, not total model capability
  5. 05
    MA
    Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
    Score
    13.4%
    Price
    $1.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 0.96 tok/s via Mistral AI

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 7 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau3 Banking, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Tau3 Banking

Grok 4.5 currently leads Tau3 Banking with 33.0%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Grok 4.533.0% · $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Muse Glimmer-30B23.5%Benchmark rank #3Solar Pro 423.0% · $0.30 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens

What is Tau3 Banking?

What Tau3 Banking measures and how its scores work.

τ³-Bench banking domain evaluates agentic models on multi-turn, tool-using customer-support scenarios in a simulated retail banking environment.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Tau3 Banking
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
tau3-banking|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Tau3 Banking.

Which model scores highest on Tau3 Banking?

Grok 4.5 is currently ranked first with 33.0%.

What does Tau3 Banking measure?

τ³-Bench banking domain evaluates agentic models on multi-turn, tool-using customer-support scenarios in a simulated retail banking environment.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

7 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.