llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Tau2 Retail

τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models26
Model coverage26
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

Tau2 Retail Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

26 rows
Columns

Show columns

01ANClaude Opus 4.6Anthropic91.9%100.0%26CAug 11, 2026
02ANClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic91.7%96.0%26CAug 11, 2026
03ANClaude Opus 4.5Anthropic88.9%92.0%26CAug 11, 2026
04MELongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601Meituan88.6%88.0%26CAug 11, 2026
05ANClaude Haiku 4.5Anthropic83.2%84.0%26CAug 11, 2026
06OPGPT-5.2OpenAI82.0%80.0%26CAug 11, 2026
07OPGPT-5OpenAI81.1%76.0%26CAug 11, 2026
08OPo3OpenAI80.2%72.0%26CAug 11, 2026
09AMNova 2 OmniAmazon78.3%68.0%26CAug 11, 2026
10OPGPT-5.1OpenAI77.9%64.0%26CAug 11, 2026
11OPGPT-5.1 InstantOpenAI77.9%60.0%26CAug 11, 2026
12OPGPT-5.1 ThinkingOpenAI77.9%56.0%26CAug 11, 2026
13AMNova 2 ProAmazon77.7%52.0%26CAug 11, 2026
14AMNova 2 LiteAmazon76.5%48.0%26CAug 11, 2026
15MELongCat-Flash-LiteMeituan73.1%44.0%26CAug 11, 2026
16ACQwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team71.9%40.0%26CAug 11, 2026
17MELongCat-Flash-ThinkingMeituan71.5%36.0%26CAug 11, 2026
18ACQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team71.3%32.0%26CAug 11, 2026
19MELongCat-Flash-ChatMeituan71.3%28.0%26CAug 11, 2026
20MAKimi K2 InstructMoonshot AI70.6%24.0%26CAug 11, 2026
21MAKimi K2-Instruct-0905Moonshot AI70.6%20.0%26CAug 11, 2026
22ACQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team67.8%16.0%26CAug 11, 2026
23OPGPT-4oOpenAI63.4%12.0%26CAug 11, 2026
24NVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIA62.8%8.0%26CAug 11, 2026
25ACQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team57.3%4.0%26CAug 11, 2026
26NVNemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)NVIDIA56.9%0.0%26CAug 11, 2026

Tau2 Retail Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Tau2 Retail

Tau2 Retail Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Claude Opus 4.691.9%Rank #2Claude Sonnet 4.691.7%Rank #3Claude Opus 4.588.9%Rank #4LongCat-Flash-Thinking-260188.6%

What is Tau2 Retail?

What Tau2 Retail measures and how its scores work.

τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Tau2 Retail
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
tau2-retail|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Tau2 Retail.

Which model scores highest on Tau2 Retail?

Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 91.9%.

What does Tau2 Retail measure?

τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

26 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.