llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Tau2 Retail Leaderboard

τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models26
Model coverage26
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Tau2 Retail Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

26 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore91.9%Percentile100.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelANClaude Sonnet 4.6AnthropicScore91.7%Percentile96.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelANClaude Opus 4.5AnthropicScore88.9%Percentile92.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelMELongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601MeituanScore88.6%Percentile88.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelANClaude Haiku 4.5AnthropicScore83.2%Percentile84.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelOPGPT-5.2OpenAIScore82.0%Percentile80.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelOPGPT-5OpenAIScore81.1%Percentile76.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelOPo3OpenAIScore80.2%Percentile72.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank09ModelAMNova 2 OmniAmazonScore78.3%Percentile68.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank10ModelOPGPT-5.1OpenAIScore77.9%Percentile64.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank11ModelOPGPT-5.1 InstantOpenAIScore77.9%Percentile60.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank12ModelOPGPT-5.1 ThinkingOpenAIScore77.9%Percentile56.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank13ModelAMNova 2 ProAmazonScore77.7%Percentile52.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank14ModelAMNova 2 LiteAmazonScore76.5%Percentile48.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank15ModelMELongCat-Flash-LiteMeituanScore73.1%Percentile44.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank16ModelACQwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore71.9%Percentile40.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank17ModelMELongCat-Flash-ThinkingMeituanScore71.5%Percentile36.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank18ModelACQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore71.3%Percentile32.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank19ModelMELongCat-Flash-ChatMeituanScore71.3%Percentile28.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank20ModelMAKimi K2 InstructMoonshot AIScore70.6%Percentile24.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank21ModelMAKimi K2-Instruct-0905Moonshot AIScore70.6%Percentile20.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank22ModelACQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore67.8%Percentile16.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank23ModelOPGPT-4oOpenAIScore63.4%Percentile12.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank24ModelNVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIAScore62.8%Percentile8.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank25ModelACQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore57.3%Percentile4.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank26ModelNVNemotron 3 Nano (30B A3B)NVIDIAScore56.9%Percentile0.0%Participants26EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

Tau2 Retail Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Claude Opus 4.691.9%Rank #2Claude Sonnet 4.691.7%Rank #3Claude Opus 4.588.9%Rank #4LongCat-Flash-Thinking-260188.6%

Tau2 Retail Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Tau2 Retail

The Top AI Models for Tau2 Retail

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis tau2 retail AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
    Score
    91.9%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 17 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 26 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Retail, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AN
    Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic
    Score
    91.7%
    Price
    $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 15 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 26 compared models
    • 96th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Retail, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
    Score
    88.9%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 42 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 26 compared models
    • 92th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Retail, not total model capability
  4. 04
    ME
    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601Meituan
    Score
    88.6%
    Speed
    Up to 100 tok/s via Meituan

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 26 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Retail, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AN
    Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic
    Score
    83.2%
    Price
    $1.0 input / $5.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 100 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 26 compared models
    • 84th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Tau2 Retail, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Tau2 Retail

Claude Opus 4.6 currently leads Tau2 Retail with 91.9%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 4.691.9% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Claude Sonnet 4.691.7% · $3.0 input / $15 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Claude Opus 4.588.9% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens

What is Tau2 Retail?

What Tau2 Retail measures and how its scores work.

τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Tau2 Retail
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
tau2-retail|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Tau2 Retail.

Which model scores highest on Tau2 Retail?

Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 91.9%.

What does Tau2 Retail measure?

τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

26 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.