reasoning benchmark
τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score91.9% | Percentile100.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAN | Score91.7% | Percentile96.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAN | Score88.9% | Percentile92.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelME | Score88.6% | Percentile88.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAN | Score83.2% | Percentile84.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelOP | Score82.0% | Percentile80.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelOP | Score81.1% | Percentile76.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelOP | Score80.2% | Percentile72.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelAM | Score78.3% | Percentile68.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelOP | Score77.9% | Percentile64.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelOP | Score77.9% | Percentile60.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelOP | Score77.9% | Percentile56.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelAM | Score77.7% | Percentile52.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank14 | ModelAM | Score76.5% | Percentile48.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank15 | ModelME | Score73.1% | Percentile44.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank16 | ModelAC | Score71.9% | Percentile40.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank17 | ModelME | Score71.5% | Percentile36.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank18 | ModelAC | Score71.3% | Percentile32.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank19 | ModelME | Score71.3% | Percentile28.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank20 | ModelMA | Score70.6% | Percentile24.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank21 | ModelMA | Score70.6% | Percentile20.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank22 | ModelAC | Score67.8% | Percentile16.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank23 | ModelOP | Score63.4% | Percentile12.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank24 | ModelNV | Score62.8% | Percentile8.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank25 | ModelAC | Score57.3% | Percentile4.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank26 | ModelNV | Score56.9% | Percentile0.0% | Participants26 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis tau2 retail AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Claude Opus 4.6 currently leads Tau2 Retail with 91.9%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What Tau2 Retail measures and how its scores work.
τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Tau2 Retail.
Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 91.9%.
τ²-bench retail domain evaluates conversational AI agents in customer service scenarios within a dual-control environment where both agent and user can interact with tools. Tests tool-agent-user interaction, rule adherence, and task consistency in retail customer support contexts.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
26 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.