reasoning benchmark
A benchmark for evaluating tool-agent-user interaction in retail environments. Tests language agents' ability to handle dynamic conversations with users while using domain-specific API tools and following policy guidelines. Evaluates agents on tasks like order cancellations, address changes, and order status checks through multi-turn conversations.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What TAU-bench Retail measures and how its scores work.
A benchmark for evaluating tool-agent-user interaction in retail environments. Tests language agents' ability to handle dynamic conversations with users while using domain-specific API tools and following policy guidelines. Evaluates agents on tasks like order cancellations, address changes, and order status checks through multi-turn conversations.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about TAU-bench Retail.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is currently ranked first with 86.2%.
A benchmark for evaluating tool-agent-user interaction in retail environments. Tests language agents' ability to handle dynamic conversations with users while using domain-specific API tools and following policy guidelines. Evaluates agents on tasks like order cancellations, address changes, and order status checks through multi-turn conversations.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
25 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.