reasoning benchmark
A benchmark for evaluating large language models on real-world freelance software engineering tasks from Upwork. Contains over 1,400 tasks valued at $1 million USD total, ranging from $50 bug fixes to $32,000 feature implementations. Includes both independent engineering tasks graded via end-to-end tests and managerial tasks assessed against original engineering managers' choices.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | OP | 66.3% | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 02 | OP | 37.3% | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 03 | OP | 32.6% | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 04 | OP | 18.0% | 0.0% | 4 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What SWE-Lancer measures and how its scores work.
A benchmark for evaluating large language models on real-world freelance software engineering tasks from Upwork. Contains over 1,400 tasks valued at $1 million USD total, ranging from $50 bug fixes to $32,000 feature implementations. Includes both independent engineering tasks graded via end-to-end tests and managerial tasks assessed against original engineering managers' choices.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SWE-Lancer.
GPT-5.1 Codex is currently ranked first with 66.3%.
A benchmark for evaluating large language models on real-world freelance software engineering tasks from Upwork. Contains over 1,400 tasks valued at $1 million USD total, ranging from $50 bug fixes to $32,000 feature implementations. Includes both independent engineering tasks graded via end-to-end tests and managerial tasks assessed against original engineering managers' choices.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.