reasoning benchmark
A human-validated subset of SWE-bench that evaluates language models' ability to resolve real-world GitHub issues using an agentless approach. The benchmark tests models on software engineering problems requiring understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files simultaneously.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | MA | 51.8% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 02 | XI | 35.7% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What SWE-bench Verified (Agentless) measures and how its scores work.
A human-validated subset of SWE-bench that evaluates language models' ability to resolve real-world GitHub issues using an agentless approach. The benchmark tests models on software engineering problems requiring understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files simultaneously.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SWE-bench Verified (Agentless).
Kimi K2 Instruct is currently ranked first with 51.8%.
A human-validated subset of SWE-bench that evaluates language models' ability to resolve real-world GitHub issues using an agentless approach. The benchmark tests models on software engineering problems requiring understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files simultaneously.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.