language benchmark
A large-scale, complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL dataset annotated by 11 college students. Contains 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries on 200 databases with multiple tables, covering 138 different domains. Requires models to generalize to both new SQL queries and new database schemas, making it distinct from previous semantic parsing tasks that use single databases.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | MA | 63.5% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 31.1% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What Spider measures and how its scores work.
A large-scale, complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL dataset annotated by 11 college students. Contains 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries on 200 databases with multiple tables, covering 138 different domains. Requires models to generalize to both new SQL queries and new database schemas, making it distinct from previous semantic parsing tasks that use single databases.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Spider.
Codestral-22B is currently ranked first with 63.5%.
A large-scale, complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL dataset annotated by 11 college students. Contains 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries on 200 databases with multiple tables, covering 138 different domains. Requires models to generalize to both new SQL queries and new database schemas, making it distinct from previous semantic parsing tasks that use single databases.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.