llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

Spider Leaderboard

A large-scale, complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL dataset annotated by 11 college students. Contains 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries on 200 databases with multiple tables, covering 138 different domains. Requires models to generalize to both new SQL queries and new database schemas, making it distinct from previous semantic parsing tasks that use single databases.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models2
Model coverage2
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

Spider Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

2 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMACodestral-22BMistral AIScore63.5%Percentile100.0%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3-Coder 480B A35B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore31.1%Percentile0.0%Participants2EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

Spider Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Codestral-22B63.5%Rank #2Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct31.1%

Spider Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

Spider

The Top AI Models for Spider

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis spider AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Codestral-22BMistral AI
    Score
    63.5%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 2 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Spider, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    31.1%
    Price
    $1.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 2 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures Spider, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for Spider

Codestral-22B currently leads Spider with 63.5%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Codestral-22B63.5%Benchmark rank #2Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct31.1% · $1.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens

What is Spider?

What Spider measures and how its scores work.

A large-scale, complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL dataset annotated by 11 college students. Contains 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries on 200 databases with multiple tables, covering 138 different domains. Requires models to generalize to both new SQL queries and new database schemas, making it distinct from previous semantic parsing tasks that use single databases.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
Spider
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
spider|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about Spider.

Which model scores highest on Spider?

Codestral-22B is currently ranked first with 63.5%.

What does Spider measure?

A large-scale, complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL dataset annotated by 11 college students. Contains 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries on 200 databases with multiple tables, covering 138 different domains. Requires models to generalize to both new SQL queries and new database schemas, making it distinct from previous semantic parsing tasks that use single databases.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

2 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.