image to text benchmark
A semantically-labeled knowledge-enhanced dataset for medical visual question answering. Contains 642 radiology images (CT scans, MRI scans, X-rays) covering five body parts and 14,028 bilingual English-Chinese question-answer pairs annotated by experienced physicians. Features comprehensive semantic labels and a structural medical knowledge base with both vision-only and knowledge-based questions requiring external medical knowledge reasoning.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 81.6% | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 80.0% | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 03 | AC | 78.7% | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 04 | GO | 62.3% | 0.0% | 4 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What SlakeVQA measures and how its scores work.
A semantically-labeled knowledge-enhanced dataset for medical visual question answering. Contains 642 radiology images (CT scans, MRI scans, X-rays) covering five body parts and 14,028 bilingual English-Chinese question-answer pairs annotated by experienced physicians. Features comprehensive semantic labels and a structural medical knowledge base with both vision-only and knowledge-based questions requiring external medical knowledge reasoning.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SlakeVQA.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is currently ranked first with 81.6%.
A semantically-labeled knowledge-enhanced dataset for medical visual question answering. Contains 642 radiology images (CT scans, MRI scans, X-rays) covering five body parts and 14,028 bilingual English-Chinese question-answer pairs annotated by experienced physicians. Features comprehensive semantic labels and a structural medical knowledge base with both vision-only and knowledge-based questions requiring external medical knowledge reasoning.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.