llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

agents benchmark

SkillsBench Leaderboard

SkillsBench evaluates coding agents on self-contained programming tasks, measuring practical engineering skills across diverse software development scenarios.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models8
Model coverage8
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

SkillsBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

8 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore70.2%Percentile100.0%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelACQwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore59.2%Percentile85.7%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelTEHy3TencentScore55.3%Percentile71.4%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore54.9%Percentile57.1%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore48.2%Percentile42.9%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3.6 PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore45.7%Percentile28.6%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelMEMuse Glimmer-30BMetaScore44.3%Percentile14.3%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore28.7%Percentile0.0%Participants8EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

SkillsBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Qwen3.8 Max70.2%Rank #2Qwen3.7 Max59.2%Rank #3Hy355.3%Rank #4Qwen3.7-Plus54.9%

SkillsBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

SkillsBench

The Top AI Models for SkillsBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis skillsbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    70.2%
    Price
    $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 8 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    AC
    Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    59.2%
    Price
    $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 5.8 tok/s via Together

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 8 compared models
    • 86th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    TE
    Hy3Tencent
    Score
    55.3%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 8 compared models
    • 71th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Qwen3.7-PlusAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    54.9%
    Price
    $0.50 input / $3.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 8 compared models
    • 57th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    48.2%
    Price
    $0.60 input / $3.6 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.1 tok/s via Novita

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 8 compared models
    • 43th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures SkillsBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for SkillsBench

Qwen3.8 Max currently leads SkillsBench with 70.2%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Qwen3.8 Max70.2% · $2.0 input / $6.0 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Qwen3.7 Max59.2% · $2.5 input / $7.5 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Hy355.3%

What is SkillsBench?

What SkillsBench measures and how its scores work.

SkillsBench evaluates coding agents on self-contained programming tasks, measuring practical engineering skills across diverse software development scenarios.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
SkillsBench
Modality
text
Primary category
agents
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
skillsbench|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about SkillsBench.

Which model scores highest on SkillsBench?

Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 70.2%.

What does SkillsBench measure?

SkillsBench evaluates coding agents on self-contained programming tasks, measuring practical engineering skills across diverse software development scenarios.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

8 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.