agents benchmark
SkillsBench evaluates coding agents on self-contained programming tasks, measuring practical engineering skills across diverse software development scenarios.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 70.2% | 100.0% | 8 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 59.2% | 85.7% | 8 | C | |
| 03 | TE | 55.3% | 71.4% | 8 | C | |
| 04 | AC | 54.9% | 57.1% | 8 | C | |
| 05 | AC | 48.2% | 42.9% | 8 | C | |
| 06 | AC | 45.7% | 28.6% | 8 | C | |
| 07 | ME | 44.3% | 14.3% | 8 | C | |
| 08 | AC | 28.7% | 0.0% | 8 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What SkillsBench measures and how its scores work.
SkillsBench evaluates coding agents on self-contained programming tasks, measuring practical engineering skills across diverse software development scenarios.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about SkillsBench.
Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 70.2%.
SkillsBench evaluates coding agents on self-contained programming tasks, measuring practical engineering skills across diverse software development scenarios.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
8 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.