reasoning benchmark
PostTrainBench Lite measures whether an agent can design and execute a full post-training strategy (data, prompts, RL recipe, and eval loop) for a pretrained base model under a constrained time budget, scored as normalized mean reward over the improvement window.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | OP | 51.5% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 02 | OP | 50.3% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 03 | OP | 29.6% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What PostTrainBench Lite measures and how its scores work.
PostTrainBench Lite measures whether an agent can design and execute a full post-training strategy (data, prompts, RL recipe, and eval loop) for a pretrained base model under a constrained time budget, scored as normalized mean reward over the improvement window.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about PostTrainBench Lite.
GPT-5.6 Terra is currently ranked first with 51.5%.
PostTrainBench Lite measures whether an agent can design and execute a full post-training strategy (data, prompts, RL recipe, and eval loop) for a pretrained base model under a constrained time budget, scored as normalized mean reward over the improvement window.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.