llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

PopQA Leaderboard

PopQA is an entity-centric open-domain question-answering dataset consisting of 14,000 QA pairs designed to evaluate language models' ability to memorize and recall factual knowledge across entities with varying popularity levels. The dataset probes both parametric memory (stored in model parameters) and non-parametric memory effectiveness, with questions covering 16 diverse relationship types from Wikidata converted to natural language using templates. Created by sampling knowledge triples from Wikidata and converting them to natural language questions, focusing on long-tail entities to understand LMs' strengths and limitations in memorizing factual knowledge.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models3
Model coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

PopQA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelIBGranite 3.3 8B BaseIBMScore26.2%Percentile100.0%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelIBGranite 3.3 8B InstructIBMScore26.2%Percentile50.0%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelIBIBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewIBMScore22.9%Percentile0.0%Participants3EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

PopQA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Granite 3.3 8B Base26.2%Rank #2Granite 3.3 8B Instruct26.2%Rank #3IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview22.9%

PopQA Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

PopQA

The Top AI Models for PopQA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis popqa AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    IB
    Granite 3.3 8B BaseIBM
    Score
    26.2%
    Speed
    Up to 50 tok/s via Replicate

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 3 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PopQA, not total model capability
  2. 02
    IB
    Granite 3.3 8B InstructIBM
    Score
    26.2%
    Speed
    Up to 50 tok/s via Replicate

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 3 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PopQA, not total model capability
  3. 03
    IB
    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewIBM
    Score
    22.9%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 3 compared models
    • 0th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PopQA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for PopQA

Granite 3.3 8B Base currently leads PopQA with 26.2%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Granite 3.3 8B Base26.2% · Up to 50 tok/s via ReplicateBenchmark rank #2Granite 3.3 8B Instruct26.2% · Up to 50 tok/s via ReplicateBenchmark rank #3IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview22.9%

What is PopQA?

What PopQA measures and how its scores work.

PopQA is an entity-centric open-domain question-answering dataset consisting of 14,000 QA pairs designed to evaluate language models' ability to memorize and recall factual knowledge across entities with varying popularity levels. The dataset probes both parametric memory (stored in model parameters) and non-parametric memory effectiveness, with questions covering 16 diverse relationship types from Wikidata converted to natural language using templates. Created by sampling knowledge triples from Wikidata and converting them to natural language questions, focusing on long-tail entities to understand LMs' strengths and limitations in memorizing factual knowledge.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
PopQA
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
popqa|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about PopQA.

Which model scores highest on PopQA?

Granite 3.3 8B Base is currently ranked first with 26.2%.

What does PopQA measure?

PopQA is an entity-centric open-domain question-answering dataset consisting of 14,000 QA pairs designed to evaluate language models' ability to memorize and recall factual knowledge across entities with varying popularity levels. The dataset probes both parametric memory (stored in model parameters) and non-parametric memory effectiveness, with questions covering 16 diverse relationship types from Wikidata converted to natural language using templates. Created by sampling knowledge triples from Wikidata and converting them to natural language questions, focusing on long-tail entities to understand LMs' strengths and limitations in memorizing factual knowledge.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.