multimodal benchmark
A novel multimodal video benchmark designed to evaluate perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained models across video, audio, and text modalities. Contains 11.6k real-world videos (average 23 seconds) filmed by participants worldwide, densely annotated with six types of labels. Focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and reasoning types (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual). Shows significant performance gap between human baseline (91.4%) and state-of-the-art video QA models (46.2%).
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 73.2% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 70.5% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What PerceptionTest measures and how its scores work.
A novel multimodal video benchmark designed to evaluate perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained models across video, audio, and text modalities. Contains 11.6k real-world videos (average 23 seconds) filmed by participants worldwide, densely annotated with six types of labels. Focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and reasoning types (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual). Shows significant performance gap between human baseline (91.4%) and state-of-the-art video QA models (46.2%).
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about PerceptionTest.
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 73.2%.
A novel multimodal video benchmark designed to evaluate perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained models across video, audio, and text modalities. Contains 11.6k real-world videos (average 23 seconds) filmed by participants worldwide, densely annotated with six types of labels. Focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and reasoning types (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual). Shows significant performance gap between human baseline (91.4%) and state-of-the-art video QA models (46.2%).
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.