llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

multimodal benchmark

PathMCQA Leaderboard

PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

PathMCQA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelGOMedGemma 4B ITGoogleScore69.8%Percentile100.0%Participants1EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

PathMCQA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1MedGemma 4B IT69.8%

The Top AI Models for PathMCQA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis pathmcqa AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    GO
    MedGemma 4B ITGoogle
    Score
    69.8%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures PathMCQA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for PathMCQA

MedGemma 4B IT currently leads PathMCQA with 69.8%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1MedGemma 4B IT69.8%

What is PathMCQA?

What PathMCQA measures and how its scores work.

PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
PathMCQA
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
pathmcqa|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about PathMCQA.

Which model scores highest on PathMCQA?

MedGemma 4B IT is currently ranked first with 69.8%.

What does PathMCQA measure?

PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.