multimodal benchmark
OSWorld 2.0 Leaderboard
OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows spanning everyday and professional tasks. Each task is an end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours, scored with a binary-completion metric, and targets challenges such as dynamic environments, cross-source reasoning, and implicit-state inference.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB
OSWorld 2.0 Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Sort by
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAN | Score70.6% | Percentile100.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelOP | Score62.6% | Percentile75.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelOP | Score50.2% | Percentile50.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelGO | Score47.9% | Percentile25.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelOP | Score45.6% | Percentile0.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
OSWorld 2.0 Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
OSWorld 2.0 Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The Top AI Models for OSWorld 2.0
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis osworld 2.0 AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
- 01ANClaude Opus 5Anthropic
- Score
- 70.6%
- Price
- $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 3.3 tok/s via Anthropic
Strengths
- Ranks #1 of 5 compared models
- 100th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures OSWorld 2.0, not total model capability
- 02OPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI
- Score
- 62.6%
- Price
- $5.0 input / $30 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 27 tok/s via OpenAI
Strengths
- Ranks #2 of 5 compared models
- 75th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures OSWorld 2.0, not total model capability
- 03OPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
- Score
- 50.2%
- Price
- $2.0 input / $12 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 35 tok/s via OpenAI
Strengths
- Ranks #3 of 5 compared models
- 50th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures OSWorld 2.0, not total model capability
- 04GOGemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
- Score
- 47.9%
- Price
- $0.75 input / $3.8 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 13 tok/s via Google
Strengths
- Ranks #4 of 5 compared models
- 25th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures OSWorld 2.0, not total model capability
- 05OPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
- Score
- 45.6%
- Price
- $0.20 input / $1.2 output per 1M tokens
- Speed
- Up to 49 tok/s via OpenAI
Strengths
- Ranks #5 of 5 compared models
- 0th percentile on this benchmark
- C evidence result
Considerations
- This result measures OSWorld 2.0, not total model capability
Selection summary
Best AI Models for OSWorld 2.0
Claude Opus 5 currently leads OSWorld 2.0 with 70.6%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What is OSWorld 2.0?
What OSWorld 2.0 measures and how its scores work.
OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows spanning everyday and professional tasks. Each task is an end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours, scored with a binary-completion metric, and targets challenges such as dynamic environments, cross-source reasoning, and implicit-state inference.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- OSWorld 2.0
- Modality
- multimodal
- Primary category
- multimodal
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- Yes
- Evaluation key
- osworld-2.0|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about OSWorld 2.0.
Which model scores highest on OSWorld 2.0?
Claude Opus 5 is currently ranked first with 70.6%.
What does OSWorld 2.0 measure?
OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows spanning everyday and professional tasks. Each task is an end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours, scored with a binary-completion metric, and targets challenges such as dynamic environments, cross-source reasoning, and implicit-state inference.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
5 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.