llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

OpenRCA Leaderboard

OpenRCA is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on root cause analysis tasks. For each failure case, the model receives 1 point if all generated root-cause elements match the ground-truth ones, and 0 points if any mismatch is identified. The overall accuracy is the average score across all failure cases.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

OpenRCA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelANClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicScore34.9%Percentile100.0%Participants1EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

OpenRCA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Claude Opus 4.634.9%

The Top AI Models for OpenRCA

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis openrca AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AN
    Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic
    Score
    34.9%
    Price
    $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 17 tok/s via Anthropic

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OpenRCA, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for OpenRCA

Claude Opus 4.6 currently leads OpenRCA with 34.9%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Claude Opus 4.634.9% · $5.0 input / $25 output per 1M tokens

What is OpenRCA?

What OpenRCA measures and how its scores work.

OpenRCA is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on root cause analysis tasks. For each failure case, the model receives 1 point if all generated root-cause elements match the ground-truth ones, and 0 points if any mismatch is identified. The overall accuracy is the average score across all failure cases.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
OpenRCA
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
openrca|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about OpenRCA.

Which model scores highest on OpenRCA?

Claude Opus 4.6 is currently ranked first with 34.9%.

What does OpenRCA measure?

OpenRCA is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on root cause analysis tasks. For each failure case, the model receives 1 point if all generated root-cause elements match the ground-truth ones, and 0 points if any mismatch is identified. The overall accuracy is the average score across all failure cases.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.