multimodal benchmark
A novel multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously. Comprises 1,142 question-answer pairs covering 8 task categories from basic perception to complex inference, with a unique constraint that accurate responses require integrated understanding of all three modalities.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 56.1% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What OmniBench measures and how its scores work.
A novel multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously. Comprises 1,142 question-answer pairs covering 8 task categories from basic perception to complex inference, with a unique constraint that accurate responses require integrated understanding of all three modalities.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about OmniBench.
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is currently ranked first with 56.1%.
A novel multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously. Comprises 1,142 question-answer pairs covering 8 task categories from basic perception to complex inference, with a unique constraint that accurate responses require integrated understanding of all three modalities.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 model results are currently shown.
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.