llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

reasoning benchmark

OJBench Leaderboard

OJBench is a competition-level code benchmark designed to assess the competitive-level code reasoning abilities of large language models. It comprises 232 programming competition problems from NOI and ICPC, categorized into Easy, Medium, and Hard difficulty levels. The benchmark evaluates models' ability to solve complex competitive programming challenges using Python and C++.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models9
Model coverage9
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

OJBench Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

9 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelMAKimi K2.6Moonshot AIScore60.6%Percentile100.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelMAKimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AIScore48.7%Percentile87.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore40.1%Percentile75.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore39.5%Percentile62.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore36.0%Percentile50.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelACQwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore32.5%Percentile37.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelACQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore29.7%Percentile25.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank08ModelMAKimi K2 InstructMoonshot AIScore27.1%Percentile12.5%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank09ModelMAKimi K2-Instruct-0905Moonshot AIScore27.1%Percentile0.0%Participants9EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

OJBench Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Kimi K2.660.6%Rank #2Kimi K2-Thinking-090548.7%Rank #3Qwen3.5-27B40.1%Rank #4Qwen3.5-122B-A10B39.5%

OJBench Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

OJBench

The Top AI Models for OJBench

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis ojbench AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    MA
    Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
    Score
    60.6%
    Price
    $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 285 tok/s via Fireworks

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 9 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OJBench, not total model capability
  2. 02
    MA
    Kimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AI
    Score
    48.7%
    Price
    $0.60 input / $2.5 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 9 compared models
    • 88th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OJBench, not total model capability
  3. 03
    AC
    Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    40.1%
    Price
    $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 6.7 tok/s via Novita

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 9 compared models
    • 75th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OJBench, not total model capability
  4. 04
    AC
    Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    39.5%
    Price
    $0.40 input / $3.2 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 9 compared models
    • 63th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OJBench, not total model capability
  5. 05
    AC
    Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    36.0%
    Price
    $0.25 input / $2.0 output per 1M tokens

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 9 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures OJBench, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for OJBench

Kimi K2.6 currently leads OJBench with 60.6%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Kimi K2.660.6% · $0.95 input / $4.0 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Kimi K2-Thinking-090548.7% · $0.60 input / $2.5 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #3Qwen3.5-27B40.1% · $0.30 input / $2.4 output per 1M tokens

What is OJBench?

What OJBench measures and how its scores work.

OJBench is a competition-level code benchmark designed to assess the competitive-level code reasoning abilities of large language models. It comprises 232 programming competition problems from NOI and ICPC, categorized into Easy, Medium, and Hard difficulty levels. The benchmark evaluates models' ability to solve complex competitive programming challenges using Python and C++.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
OJBench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
ojbench|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about OJBench.

Which model scores highest on OJBench?

Kimi K2.6 is currently ranked first with 60.6%.

What does OJBench measure?

OJBench is a competition-level code benchmark designed to assess the competitive-level code reasoning abilities of large language models. It comprises 232 programming competition problems from NOI and ICPC, categorized into Easy, Medium, and Hard difficulty levels. The benchmark evaluates models' ability to solve complex competitive programming challenges using Python and C++.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

9 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.