code benchmark
OctoCodingBench
Octopus coding benchmark for evaluating multi-language programming capabilities
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB
OctoCodingBench Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | MI | 26.1% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
OctoCodingBench Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is OctoCodingBench?
What OctoCodingBench measures and how its scores work.
Octopus coding benchmark for evaluating multi-language programming capabilities
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- OctoCodingBench
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- code
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- octocodingbench|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about OctoCodingBench.
Which model scores highest on OctoCodingBench?
MiniMax M2.1 is currently ranked first with 26.1%.
What does OctoCodingBench measure?
Octopus coding benchmark for evaluating multi-language programming capabilities
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
1 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.