image to text benchmark
OCRBench v2 Chinese subset: Enhanced benchmark for evaluating Large Multimodal Models on visual text localization and reasoning with Chinese text content
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 63.5% | 100.0% | 11 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 62.1% | 90.0% | 11 | C | |
| 03 | AC | 61.8% | 80.0% | 11 | C | |
| 04 | AC | 61.2% | 70.0% | 11 | C | |
| 05 | AC | 60.4% | 60.0% | 11 | C | |
| 06 | AC | 59.2% | 50.0% | 11 | C | |
| 07 | AC | 59.2% | 40.0% | 11 | C | |
| 08 | AC | 59.1% | 30.0% | 11 | C | |
| 09 | AC | 57.8% | 20.0% | 11 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 57.6% | 10.0% | 11 | C | |
| 11 | AC | 55.8% | 0.0% | 11 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What OCRBench-V2 (zh) measures and how its scores work.
OCRBench v2 Chinese subset: Enhanced benchmark for evaluating Large Multimodal Models on visual text localization and reasoning with Chinese text content
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about OCRBench-V2 (zh).
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is currently ranked first with 63.5%.
OCRBench v2 Chinese subset: Enhanced benchmark for evaluating Large Multimodal Models on visual text localization and reasoning with Chinese text content
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
11 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.