llmboard.aiLeaderboard Center
Overall
Overall RankingOpen Models
Tools
Model DirectoryCompare Models
Capabilities
CodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction Following
Price & Efficiency
Price & ValueCapability vs. PriceRuntime Performance
Modalities
Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech ModelsEmbeddings
Core Benchmarks
GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-ProView all benchmarks
Methods
Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

language benchmark

MultiPL-E

MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to multiple programming languages. It extends HumanEval and MBPP Python benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of neural code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and language features.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models13
Model coverage13
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

MultiPL-E Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

13 rows
Columns

Show columns

01ACQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team87.9%100.0%13CAug 11, 2026
02ACQwen3-Next-80B-A3B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team87.8%91.7%13CAug 11, 2026
03ACQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team86.1%83.3%13CAug 11, 2026
04MAKimi K2 InstructMoonshot AI85.7%75.0%13CAug 11, 2026
05MAKimi K2-Instruct-0905Moonshot AI85.7%66.7%13CAug 11, 2026
06ACQwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team75.4%58.3%13CAug 11, 2026
07ACQwen2.5 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team75.1%50.0%13CAug 11, 2026
08ACQwen2.5 14B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team72.8%41.7%13CAug 11, 2026
09ACQwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team70.4%33.3%13CAug 11, 2026
10ACQwen2 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team69.2%25.0%13CAug 11, 2026
11ACQwen3 235B A22BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team65.9%16.7%13CAug 11, 2026
12ACQwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team65.8%8.3%13CAug 11, 2026
13ACQwen2 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team59.1%0.0%13CAug 11, 2026

MultiPL-E Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MultiPL-E

MultiPL-E Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-250787.9%Rank #2Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct87.8%Rank #3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct86.1%Rank #4Kimi K2 Instruct85.7%

What is MultiPL-E?

What MultiPL-E measures and how its scores work.

MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to multiple programming languages. It extends HumanEval and MBPP Python benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of neural code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and language features.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MultiPL-E
Modality
text
Primary category
language
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
multipl-e|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MultiPL-E.

Which model scores highest on MultiPL-E?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is currently ranked first with 87.9%.

What does MultiPL-E measure?

MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to multiple programming languages. It extends HumanEval and MBPP Python benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of neural code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and language features.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

13 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.