reasoning benchmark
MultiChallenge is a realistic multi-turn conversation evaluation benchmark that challenges frontier LLMs across four key categories: instruction retention (maintaining instructions throughout conversations), inference memory (recalling and connecting details from previous turns), reliable versioned editing (adapting to evolving instructions during collaborative editing), and self-coherence (avoiding contradictions in responses). The benchmark evaluates models on sustained, contextually complex dialogues across diverse topics including travel planning, technical documentation, and professional communication.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What Multi-Challenge measures and how its scores work.
MultiChallenge is a realistic multi-turn conversation evaluation benchmark that challenges frontier LLMs across four key categories: instruction retention (maintaining instructions throughout conversations), inference memory (recalling and connecting details from previous turns), reliable versioned editing (adapting to evolving instructions during collaborative editing), and self-coherence (avoiding contradictions in responses). The benchmark evaluates models on sustained, contextually complex dialogues across diverse topics including travel planning, technical documentation, and professional communication.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of C.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Multi-Challenge.
Nova 2 Pro is currently ranked first with 77.7%.
MultiChallenge is a realistic multi-turn conversation evaluation benchmark that challenges frontier LLMs across four key categories: instruction retention (maintaining instructions throughout conversations), inference memory (recalling and connecting details from previous turns), reliable versioned editing (adapting to evolving instructions during collaborative editing), and self-coherence (avoiding contradictions in responses). The benchmark evaluates models on sustained, contextually complex dialogues across diverse topics including travel planning, technical documentation, and professional communication.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
29 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.