reasoning benchmark
A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving that evaluates Large Language Models' ability to resolve software issues across diverse programming ecosystems. Covers 7 programming languages (Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++) with 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated by 68 expert annotators. Addresses limitations of existing benchmarks that focus almost exclusively on Python.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | MI | 52.7% | 100.0% | 6 | C | |
| 02 | MI | 51.3% | 80.0% | 6 | C | |
| 03 | MI | 49.4% | 60.0% | 6 | C | |
| 04 | MA | 41.9% | 40.0% | 6 | C | |
| 05 | MI | 36.2% | 20.0% | 6 | C | |
| 06 | AC | 25.8% | 0.0% | 6 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What Multi-SWE-Bench measures and how its scores work.
A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving that evaluates Large Language Models' ability to resolve software issues across diverse programming ecosystems. Covers 7 programming languages (Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++) with 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated by 68 expert annotators. Addresses limitations of existing benchmarks that focus almost exclusively on Python.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about Multi-SWE-Bench.
MiniMax M2.7 is currently ranked first with 52.7%.
A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving that evaluates Large Language Models' ability to resolve software issues across diverse programming ecosystems. Covers 7 programming languages (Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++) with 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated by 68 expert annotators. Addresses limitations of existing benchmarks that focus almost exclusively on Python.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
6 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.