llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

clustering benchmark

MIEB(eng) Clustering Leaderboard

Direct model-level leaderboard results from MTEB.

Updated Aug 18, 2026

Models48
Model coverage48
MetricOfficial leaderboard task-type mean
EvidenceA

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MIEB(eng) Clustering Ranking

Higher official leaderboard task-type mean ranks better on this benchmark.

30 of 48 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Official leaderboard task-type mean
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelQUEVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plusQuansunOfficial leaderboard task-type mean92.4%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank02ModelQUEVA02-CLIP-bigE-14QuansunOfficial leaderboard task-type mean89.4%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank03ModelQUEVA02-CLIP-L-14QuansunOfficial leaderboard task-type mean88.3%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank04ModelLACLIP-ViT-L-14-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90KLaionOfficial leaderboard task-type mean86.4%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank05ModelJIjina-embeddings-v5-omni-smallJinaaiOfficial leaderboard task-type mean86.0%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank06ModelLACLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160kLaionOfficial leaderboard task-type mean85.6%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank07ModelLACLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79KLaionOfficial leaderboard task-type mean83.9%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank08ModelNAnomic-embed-vision-v1.5Nomic AiOfficial leaderboard task-type mean83.6%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank09ModelLACLIP-ViT-L-14-laion2B-s32B-b82KLaionOfficial leaderboard task-type mean83.5%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank10ModelFAdinov2-largeFacebookOfficial leaderboard task-type mean83.1%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank11ModelFAdinov2-baseFacebookOfficial leaderboard task-type mean82.7%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank12ModelLACLIP-ViT-g-14-laion2B-s34B-b88KLaionOfficial leaderboard task-type mean82.7%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank13ModelQUEVA02-CLIP-B-16QuansunOfficial leaderboard task-type mean82.5%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank14ModelVOvoyage-multimodal-3VoyageaiOfficial leaderboard task-type mean82.4%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank15ModelGOsiglip-large-patch16-256GoogleOfficial leaderboard task-type mean82.1%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank16ModelGOsiglip-so400m-patch14-384GoogleOfficial leaderboard task-type mean82.1%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank17ModelLACLIP-ViT-B-16-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90KLaionOfficial leaderboard task-type mean81.7%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank18ModelFAdinov2-giantFacebookOfficial leaderboard task-type mean81.4%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank19ModelFAdinov2-smallFacebookOfficial leaderboard task-type mean80.2%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank20ModelGOsiglip-large-patch16-384GoogleOfficial leaderboard task-type mean79.9%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank21ModelLACLIP-ViT-B-32-laion2B-s34B-b79KLaionOfficial leaderboard task-type mean78.0%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank22ModelSAblip-itm-large-cocoSalesforceOfficial leaderboard task-type mean77.5%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank23ModelLACLIP-ViT-B-32-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90KLaionOfficial leaderboard task-type mean77.4%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank24ModelSAblip-itm-large-flickrSalesforceOfficial leaderboard task-type mean76.4%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank25ModelOPclip-vit-large-patch14OpenAIOfficial leaderboard task-type mean76.4%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank26ModelGOsiglip-base-patch16-384GoogleOfficial leaderboard task-type mean76.3%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank27ModelBAbge-visualized-baseBaaiOfficial leaderboard task-type mean76.2%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank28ModelGOsiglip-base-patch16-256GoogleOfficial leaderboard task-type mean75.2%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank29ModelGOsiglip-base-patch16-512GoogleOfficial leaderboard task-type mean74.7%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank30ModelGOsiglip-base-patch16-256-multilingualGoogleOfficial leaderboard task-type mean74.6%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank31ModelGOsiglip-base-patch16-224GoogleOfficial leaderboard task-type mean74.5%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank32ModelSAblip2-opt-2.7bSalesforceOfficial leaderboard task-type mean74.0%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank33ModelNVmoco-v3-vit-bNyu VisionxOfficial leaderboard task-type mean73.9%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank34ModelSAblip-image-captioning-largeSalesforceOfficial leaderboard task-type mean73.7%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank35ModelBAbge-visualized-m3BaaiOfficial leaderboard task-type mean73.6%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank36ModelTLVLM2Vec-LoRATiger LabOfficial leaderboard task-type mean72.6%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank37ModelJIjina-embeddings-v5-omni-nanoJinaaiOfficial leaderboard task-type mean72.3%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank38ModelNVmoco-v3-vit-lNyu VisionxOfficial leaderboard task-type mean71.7%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank39ModelTLVLM2Vec-FullTiger LabOfficial leaderboard task-type mean70.7%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank40ModelSAblip-itm-base-cocoSalesforceOfficial leaderboard task-type mean70.6%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank41ModelROe5-vRoyokongOfficial leaderboard task-type mean70.0%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank42ModelJIjina-clip-v1JinaaiOfficial leaderboard task-type mean70.0%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank43ModelOPclip-vit-base-patch16OpenAIOfficial leaderboard task-type mean69.5%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank44ModelOPclip-vit-base-patch32OpenAIOfficial leaderboard task-type mean67.9%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank45ModelSAblip2-opt-6.7b-cocoSalesforceOfficial leaderboard task-type mean67.8%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank46ModelSAblip-itm-base-flickrSalesforceOfficial leaderboard task-type mean67.3%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank47ModelSAblip-image-captioning-baseSalesforceOfficial leaderboard task-type mean63.1%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026
Rank48ModelKAalign-baseKakaobrainOfficial leaderboard task-type mean59.6%PercentileN/AParticipants48EvidenceAEvaluatedAug 18, 2026

MIEB(eng) Clustering Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus92.4%Rank #2EVA02-CLIP-bigE-1489.4%Rank #3EVA02-CLIP-L-1488.3%Rank #4CLIP-ViT-L-14-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90K86.4%

MIEB(eng) Clustering Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MIEB(eng) Clustering

The Top AI Models for MIEB(eng) Clustering

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis mieb(eng) clustering AI model leaderboard uses descending official leaderboard task-type mean in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    QU
    EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plusQuansun
    Official leaderboard task-type mean
    92.4%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 48 compared models
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MIEB(eng) Clustering, not total model capability
  2. 02
    QU
    EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14Quansun
    Official leaderboard task-type mean
    89.4%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 48 compared models
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MIEB(eng) Clustering, not total model capability
  3. 03
    QU
    EVA02-CLIP-L-14Quansun
    Official leaderboard task-type mean
    88.3%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 48 compared models
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MIEB(eng) Clustering, not total model capability
  4. 04
    LA
    CLIP-ViT-L-14-DataComp.XL-s13B-b90KLaion
    Official leaderboard task-type mean
    86.4%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 48 compared models
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MIEB(eng) Clustering, not total model capability
  5. 05
    JI
    jina-embeddings-v5-omni-smallJinaai
    Official leaderboard task-type mean
    86.0%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 48 compared models
    • A evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MIEB(eng) Clustering, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MIEB(eng) Clustering

EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus currently leads MIEB(eng) Clustering with 92.4%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus92.4%Benchmark rank #2EVA02-CLIP-bigE-1489.4%Benchmark rank #3EVA02-CLIP-L-1488.3%

What is MIEB(eng) Clustering?

What MIEB(eng) Clustering measures and how its scores work.

Direct model-level leaderboard results from MTEB.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is verified and has an evidence level of A.

Family
MIEB(eng):clustering
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
clustering
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
mteb-mieb-eng-clustering|mteb|current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MIEB(eng) Clustering.

Which model scores highest on MIEB(eng) Clustering?

EVA02-CLIP-bigE-14-plus is currently ranked first with 92.4%.

What does MIEB(eng) Clustering measure?

Direct model-level leaderboard results from MTEB.

Is a higher official leaderboard task-type mean better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

48 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.