long context benchmark
MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | GO | 93.0% | 100.0% | 7 | C | |
| 02 | GO | 82.6% | 83.3% | 7 | C | |
| 03 | GO | 71.9% | 66.7% | 7 | C | |
| 04 | GO | 69.2% | 50.0% | 7 | C | |
| 05 | GO | 54.7% | 33.3% | 7 | C | |
| 06 | XI | 45.7% | 16.7% | 7 | C | |
| 07 | GO | 32.0% | 0.0% | 7 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What MRCR measures and how its scores work.
MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MRCR.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is currently ranked first with 93.0%.
MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
7 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.