llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

long context benchmark

MRCR Leaderboard

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models7
Model coverage7
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Distribution
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MRCR Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

7 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelGOGemini 2.5 ProGoogleScore93.0%Percentile100.0%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank02ModelGOGemini 1.5 ProGoogleScore82.6%Percentile83.3%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank03ModelGOGemini 1.5 FlashGoogleScore71.9%Percentile66.7%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank04ModelGOGemini 2.0 FlashGoogleScore69.2%Percentile50.0%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank05ModelGOGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGoogleScore54.7%Percentile33.3%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank06ModelXIMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomiScore45.7%Percentile16.7%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026
Rank07ModelGOGemini 2.5 FlashGoogleScore32.0%Percentile0.0%Participants7EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

MRCR Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Gemini 2.5 Pro93.0%Rank #2Gemini 1.5 Pro82.6%Rank #3Gemini 1.5 Flash71.9%Rank #4Gemini 2.0 Flash69.2%

MRCR Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MRCR

The Top AI Models for MRCR

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis mrcr AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    GO
    Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle
    Score
    93.0%
    Price
    $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokens
    Speed
    Up to 86 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 7 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR, not total model capability
  2. 02
    GO
    Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle
    Score
    82.6%
    Speed
    Up to 85 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #2 of 7 compared models
    • 83th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR, not total model capability
  3. 03
    GO
    Gemini 1.5 FlashGoogle
    Score
    71.9%
    Speed
    Up to 150 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #3 of 7 compared models
    • 67th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR, not total model capability
  4. 04
    GO
    Gemini 2.0 FlashGoogle
    Score
    69.2%
    Speed
    Up to 183 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #4 of 7 compared models
    • 50th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR, not total model capability
  5. 05
    GO
    Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BGoogle
    Score
    54.7%
    Speed
    Up to 150 tok/s via Google

    Strengths

    • Ranks #5 of 7 compared models
    • 33th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MRCR, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MRCR

Gemini 2.5 Pro currently leads MRCR with 93.0%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Gemini 2.5 Pro93.0% · $1.3 input / $10 output per 1M tokensBenchmark rank #2Gemini 1.5 Pro82.6% · Up to 85 tok/s via GoogleBenchmark rank #3Gemini 1.5 Flash71.9% · Up to 150 tok/s via Google

What is MRCR?

What MRCR measures and how its scores work.

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MRCR
Modality
text
Primary category
long context
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
mrcr|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MRCR.

Which model scores highest on MRCR?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is currently ranked first with 93.0%.

What does MRCR measure?

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

7 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.