llmboard.aiAI model intelligence
Home

Model Rankings

OverallOpen ModelsAgentCodingReasoningMathKnowledgeInstruction FollowingTextVision
Image GenerationImage Editing
Video GenerationImage to VideoVideo Editing
Text to SpeechSpeech to Text
Embeddings

Efficiency

Chat Token PricingImage PricingVideo PricingAudio Pricing
Chat Speed & LatencyProvider Reliability

Benchmarks

GPQAMMLU-ProAIME 2025SWE-Bench VerifiedMMLUHumanity's Last ExamLiveCodeBenchMATHHumanEvalMMMU-Pro
All Benchmarks

Tools

Model DirectoryCompare Models

Scoring & Data

Scoring & Data
393 models668 benchmarks

Leaderboard Center

Overall RankingCodingCore BenchmarksPrice & ValueRuntime Performance

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Data & Methods

Scoring MethodAll BenchmarksReasoningMath

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai

math benchmark

MMVetGPT4Turbo Leaderboard

MM-Vet evaluation using GPT-4 Turbo for scoring. This variant of MM-Vet examines large multimodal models on complicated multimodal tasks requiring integrated capabilities across six core vision-language abilities: recognition, knowledge, spatial awareness, language generation, OCR, and math.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • Top models
  • About
  • FAQ

MMVetGPT4Turbo Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 rows
Columns

Show columns

Sort by
Rank
Model
Score
Percentile
Participants
Evidence
Evaluated
Rank01ModelACQwen2-VL-72B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamScore74.0%Percentile100.0%Participants1EvidenceCEvaluatedAug 17, 2026

MMVetGPT4Turbo Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct74.0%

The Top AI Models for MMVetGPT4Turbo

The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.

Ranking basisThis mmvetgpt4turbo AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.

  1. 01
    AC
    Qwen2-VL-72B-InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
    Score
    74.0%

    Strengths

    • Ranks #1 of 1 compared models
    • 100th percentile on this benchmark
    • C evidence result

    Considerations

    • This result measures MMVetGPT4Turbo, not total model capability

Selection summary

Best AI Models for MMVetGPT4Turbo

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct currently leads MMVetGPT4Turbo with 74.0%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.

Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.

Benchmark rank #1Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct74.0%

What is MMVetGPT4Turbo?

What MMVetGPT4Turbo measures and how its scores work.

MM-Vet evaluation using GPT-4 Turbo for scoring. This variant of MM-Vet examines large multimodal models on complicated multimodal tasks requiring integrated capabilities across six core vision-language abilities: recognition, knowledge, spatial awareness, language generation, OCR, and math.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MMVetGPT4Turbo
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
mmvetgpt4turbo|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MMVetGPT4Turbo.

Which model scores highest on MMVetGPT4Turbo?

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is currently ranked first with 74.0%.

What does MMVetGPT4Turbo measure?

MM-Vet evaluation using GPT-4 Turbo for scoring. This variant of MM-Vet examines large multimodal models on complicated multimodal tasks requiring integrated capabilities across six core vision-language abilities: recognition, knowledge, spatial awareness, language generation, OCR, and math.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.