multimodal benchmark
Validation set for MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning) benchmark, designed to evaluate multimodal models on massive multi-discipline tasks demanding college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning across Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | AC | 80.6% | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 02 | AC | 78.7% | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 03 | AN | 77.8% | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 04 | AC | 64.5% | 0.0% | 4 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What MMMUval measures and how its scores work.
Validation set for MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning) benchmark, designed to evaluate multimodal models on massive multi-discipline tasks demanding college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning across Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMMUval.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is currently ranked first with 80.6%.
Validation set for MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning) benchmark, designed to evaluate multimodal models on massive multi-discipline tasks demanding college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning across Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.