multimodal benchmark
Validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. Features college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines (Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, Tech & Engineering) spanning 30 subjects and 183 subfields with diverse image types including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score78.1% | Percentile100.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score76.0% | Percentile91.7% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score76.0% | Percentile83.3% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score74.2% | Percentile75.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score74.1% | Percentile66.7% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank06 | ModelAC | Score70.8% | Percentile58.3% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank07 | ModelAC | Score69.6% | Percentile50.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank08 | ModelAC | Score67.4% | Percentile41.7% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank09 | ModelGO | Score64.9% | Percentile33.3% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank10 | ModelGO | Score59.6% | Percentile25.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank11 | ModelGO | Score48.8% | Percentile16.7% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank12 | ModelLA | Score48.4% | Percentile8.3% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank13 | ModelCO | Score32.9% | Percentile0.0% | Participants13 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis mmmu (val) AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking currently leads MMMU (val) with 78.1%. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What MMMU (val) measures and how its scores work.
Validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. Features college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines (Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, Tech & Engineering) spanning 30 subjects and 183 subfields with diverse image types including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMMU (val).
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is currently ranked first with 78.1%.
Validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. Features college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines (Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, Tech & Engineering) spanning 30 subjects and 183 subfields with diverse image types including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.