long context benchmark
MMLongBench-Doc evaluates long document understanding capabilities in vision-language models.
Updated Aug 17, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
Rank | Model | Score | Percentile | Participants | Evidence | Evaluated |
|---|
| Rank01 | ModelAC | Score0.62 points | Percentile100.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank02 | ModelAC | Score0.602 points | Percentile75.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank03 | ModelAC | Score0.595 points | Percentile50.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank04 | ModelAC | Score0.59 points | Percentile25.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
| Rank05 | ModelAC | Score0.562 points | Percentile0.0% | Participants5 | EvidenceC | Evaluated |
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The first five results on this benchmark, with official price and output speed added where the model identity can be matched.
Ranking basisThis mmlongbench-doc AI model leaderboard uses descending score in the benchmark's original unit. The leaderboard ranking keeps matched price and speed data separate from benchmark evidence.
Selection summary
Qwen3.6 Plus currently leads MMLongBench-Doc with 0.62 points. It is the top model on this specific benchmark, while the best LLM for the broader task should also be checked against other benchmarks, price and runtime.
Use this leaderboard with the supporting benchmark results and coverage details above. A leaderboard position summarizes the selected ranking signal; it does not replace workload-specific testing.
What MMLongBench-Doc measures and how its scores work.
MMLongBench-Doc evaluates long document understanding capabilities in vision-language models.
Scores are shown in points. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MMLongBench-Doc.
Qwen3.6 Plus is currently ranked first with 0.62 points.
MMLongBench-Doc evaluates long document understanding capabilities in vision-language models.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.