multimodal benchmark
A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models measuring both perception and cognition abilities across 14 subtasks. Features manually designed instruction-answer pairs to avoid data leakage and provides systematic quantitative assessment of MLLM capabilities.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 01 | DE | 22.5% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 02 | DE | 21.2% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 03 | DE | 19.1% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What MME measures and how its scores work.
A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models measuring both perception and cognition abilities across 14 subtasks. Features manually designed instruction-answer pairs to avoid data leakage and provides systematic quantitative assessment of MLLM capabilities.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
Common questions about MME.
DeepSeek VL2 is currently ranked first with 22.5%.
A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models measuring both perception and cognition abilities across 14 subtasks. Features manually designed instruction-answer pairs to avoid data leakage and provides systematic quantitative assessment of MLLM capabilities.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 model results are currently shown.
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.